↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COL091-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 51.33s 21.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 51.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  28   ~;  46   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn  56   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f158,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : combK != comb_app(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_app) ).

fof(f171,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2)
      | ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2)
      | ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2)
      | ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(X0,X1),X2),contract) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE1) ).

fof(f174,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = comb_app(combK,X2)
      | ~ ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE4) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( comb_app(combK,X2) = X0
      | ~ ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f174]) ).

fof(f181,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(X0,X1,X2)),ap_contractE_sk1q(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE9) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(X0,X1,X2)),ap_contractE_sk1q(X0,X1,X2)) = X0
      | ~ ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f181]) ).

fof(f183,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X0,ap_contractE_sk2q(X0,X1,X2)),contract)
      | ~ ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE10) ).

fof(f187,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X1,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)),contract)
      | ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE13) ).

fof(f189,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X2 = comb_app(X0,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE15) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( comb_app(X0,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)) = X2
      | ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f189]) ).

fof(f191,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ member(pair(combK,X0),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_contractE) ).

fof(f193,axiom,
    member(pair(comb_app(combK,p),r),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_h1) ).

fof(f194,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(pair(p,X0),contract)
      | r != comb_app(combK,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_c1) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(pair(p,X0),contract)
      | comb_app(combK,X0) != r ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f194]) ).

tcf(c_360,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : comb_app(X0,X1) != combK,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

tcf(c_372,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2)
      | ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2)
      | ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2)
      | ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(X0,X1),X2),contract) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).

tcf(c_375,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( comb_app(combK,X2) = X0 )
      | ~ ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f175]) ).

tcf(c_380,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(X0,X1,X2)),ap_contractE_sk1q(X0,X1,X2)) = X0 )
      | ~ ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

tcf(c_381,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X0,ap_contractE_sk2q(X0,X1,X2)),contract)
      | ~ ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).

tcf(c_384,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X1,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)),contract)
      | ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).

tcf(c_386,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( comb_app(X0,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)) = X2 )
      | ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).

tcf(c_387,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ member(pair(combK,X0),contract),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f191]) ).

tcf(c_389,plain,
    member(pair(comb_app(combK,p),r),contract),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f193]) ).

tcf(c_390,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ member(pair(p,X0),contract)
      | ( comb_app(combK,X0) != r ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f195]) ).

tcf(c_6385,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ ap_contractE_c3(combK,X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_381,c_387]) ).

tcf(c_6396,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_389,c_372]) ).

tcf(c_6402,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
    | ( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6396,c_386]) ).

tcf(c_6406,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
    | ( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6402,c_6385]) ).

tcf(c_6423,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK )
    | ( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6406,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_6437,plain,
    ( ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK )
    | ( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r )
    | ( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(combK,p,r)),ap_contractE_sk1q(combK,p,r)) = combK ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6423,c_380]) ).

tcf(c_6481,plain,
    ( ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK )
    | ( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6437,c_360]) ).

tcf(c_6500,plain,
    ( ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK )
    | ~ member(pair(p,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)),contract) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6481,c_390]) ).

tcf(c_6536,plain,
    ( ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK )
    | ~ ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_384,c_6500]) ).

tcf(c_6537,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
    | ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6396,c_6536]) ).

tcf(c_6546,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
    | ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6537,c_6385]) ).

tcf(c_6549,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6546,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_6555,plain,
    ( ( comb_app(combK,r) = combK )
    | ( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(combK,p,r)),ap_contractE_sk1q(combK,p,r)) = combK ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6549,c_380]) ).

tcf(c_6568,plain,
    comb_app(combK,r) = combK,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6555,c_360]) ).

tcf(c_6583,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6568,c_360]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL091-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.39  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:35:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 51.33/21.03  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 51.33/21.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------  iProver source info
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 51.33/21.03  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 51.33/21.03  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 11 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Proving...
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % 
% 51.33/21.03  % clauses                               147
% 51.33/21.03  % conjectures                           1
% 51.33/21.03  % EPR                                   14
% 51.33/21.03  % Horn                                  122
% 51.33/21.03  % unary                                 19
% 51.33/21.03  % binary                                89
% 51.33/21.03  % lits                                  319
% 51.33/21.03  % lits eq                               56
% 51.33/21.03  % fd_pure                               0
% 51.33/21.03  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 51.33/21.03  % fd_cond                               0
% 51.33/21.03  % fd_pseudo_cond                        19
% 51.33/21.03  % AC symbols                            0
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ 
% 51.33/21.03  % Current options:
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Proving...
% 51.33/21.03  % 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Proving...
% 51.33/21.03  % 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % ------ Proving...
% 51.33/21.03  % 
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 51.33/21.03  
% 51.33/21.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 51.33/21.04  
% 51.33/21.04  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------