↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COL099-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.65s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  37   ~;  31   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn  43   !;   0   ?;  31   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f163,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(X2))
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r_into_trancl) ).

fof(f166,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X3,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X1,X2,X3,X0)),trancl(X0))
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X2),trancl(X0))
      | ~ diamond(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diamond_strip_lemmaD1) ).

fof(f167,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X2,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X1,X2,X3,X0)),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X2),trancl(X0))
      | ~ diamond(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diamond_strip_lemmaD2) ).

fof(f168,axiom,
    diamond(r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diamond_trancl_1h1) ).

fof(f169,axiom,
    member(pair(y,ya),r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diamond_trancl_1h2) ).

fof(f170,negated_conjecture,
    member(pair(y,yp),trancl(r)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diamond_trancl_1c1) ).

fof(f171,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(pair(yp,X0),trancl(r))
      | ~ member(pair(ya,X0),trancl(r)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diamond_trancl_1c2) ).

tcf(c_206,plain,
    diamond(r),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).

tcf(c_207,plain,
    member(pair(y,ya),r),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f169]) ).

tcf(c_208,negated_conjecture,
    member(pair(y,yp),trancl(r)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f170]) ).

tcf(c_209,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ member(pair(yp,X0),trancl(r))
      | ~ member(pair(ya,X0),trancl(r)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).

tcf(c_210,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X1,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X0,X1,X3,X2)),X2)
      | ~ diamond(X2)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X3),X2)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

tcf(c_211,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X3,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X0,X1,X3,X2)),trancl(X2))
      | ~ diamond(X2)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X3),X2)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).

tcf(c_216,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(X2))
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).

tcf(c_302,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X2,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X1,X2,X3,X0)),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X2),trancl(X0))
      | ( X0 != r ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_303,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X1,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X0,X1,X2,r)),r)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X2),r)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(r)) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_302]) ).

tcf(c_314,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X3,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X1,X2,X3,X0)),trancl(X0))
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X2),trancl(X0))
      | ( X0 != r ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_211,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X2,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X0,X1,X2,r)),trancl(r))
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X2),r)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(r)) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_314]) ).

tcf(c_596,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,ya),r)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(r))
      | ~ member(pair(yp,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X0,X1,ya,r)),trancl(r)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_209]) ).

tcf(c_612,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,ya),r)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),trancl(r))
      | ~ member(pair(yp,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X0,X1,ya,r)),r) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_596]) ).

tcf(c_652,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,ya),r)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,yp),trancl(r)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_303,c_612]) ).

tcf(c_661,plain,
    ~ member(pair(y,ya),r),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_208,c_652]) ).

tcf(c_662,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_661,c_207]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL099-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:39:43 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.41  
% 0.11/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.41  
% 0.11/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.43  % Proving...
% 3.65/1.20  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/1.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.65/1.20  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.65/1.20  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Proving...
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % 
% 3.65/1.20  % clauses                               10
% 3.65/1.20  % conjectures                           2
% 3.65/1.20  % EPR                                   0
% 3.65/1.20  % Horn                                  10
% 3.65/1.20  % unary                                 4
% 3.65/1.20  % binary                                4
% 3.65/1.20  % lits                                  18
% 3.65/1.20  % lits eq                               6
% 3.65/1.20  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.65/1.20  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.65/1.20  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.65/1.20  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 3.65/1.20  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ 
% 3.65/1.20  % Current options:
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % ------ Proving...
% 3.65/1.20  % 
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.65/1.20  
% 3.65/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------