%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : COL101-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:10:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)),
cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : COL101-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.48 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.23/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.23/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.23/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.23/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.23/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.23/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.23/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:11:25 UTC 2026
% 0.23/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % sh5l with pid 1065006 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.59 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.59 % Search class: FUUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1065014 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.59 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.59 % Search class: FUUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.59
% 0.26/0.59 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.59 % Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.26/0.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Initial clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.26/0.59 % Processed clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.59 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.26/0.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.26/0.59 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 60
% 0.26/0.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.26/0.59
% 0.26/0.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.59 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.59 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.59 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.26/0.59
% 0.26/0.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.59 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.59 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.59 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------