%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Moca---0.1 % Problem : COL101-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : moca.sh %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:37:48 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s % Output : Proof 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : COL101-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 10:54:29 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 0.12/0.38 % SZS output start Proof % 0.12/0.38 The input problem is unsatisfiable because % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable: % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract, tc_Comb_Ocomb), tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ==> \bottom % 0.12/0.38 c_in(c_Pair(V_a, V_a, T_a, T_a), c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(V_r, T_a), tc_prod(T_a, T_a)) % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 This holds because % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)): % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 E: % 0.12/0.38 c_in(c_Pair(V_a, V_a, T_a, T_a), c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(V_r, T_a), tc_prod(T_a, T_a)) = true__ % 0.12/0.38 f1(c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract, tc_Comb_Ocomb), tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb))) = true__ % 0.12/0.38 f1(true__) = false__ % 0.12/0.38 G: % 0.12/0.38 true__ = false__ % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 This holds because % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS: % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 c_in(c_Pair(V_a, V_a, T_a, T_a), c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(V_r, T_a), tc_prod(T_a, T_a)) -> true__ % 0.12/0.38 f1(c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract, tc_Comb_Ocomb), tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb))) -> true__ % 0.12/0.38 f1(true__) -> false__ % 0.12/0.38 false__ -> true__ % 0.12/0.38 with the LPO induced by % 0.12/0.38 tc_prod > c_Comb_Ocontract > c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl > tc_Comb_Ocomb > v_z > v_x > c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D > c_Pair > c_in > f1 > false__ > true__ % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 % SZS output end Proof % 0.12/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------