↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : COL102-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:37:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.29s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 2.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (  10   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Ocontract_OAp1_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X1,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(X4,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X0,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f6,f3]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f2]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f5]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f16,f4]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f17,f1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL102-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:39:28 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056122)Input is clausal, will run a generic CNF schedule.
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2879544970:st=5:avsq=on:i=117:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/117Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)First to succeed.
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2056122"
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056128)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:urr=on:br=off:random_seed=4240524987:i=132376:av=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/132376Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056130)lrs+10_1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:random_seed=416568243:i=107:sd=3:ss=axioms:sgt=8_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/107Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056132)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=4085436212:s2a=on:i=180:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/180Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056129)lrs+1002_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=ground:npcc=on:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=intro:random_seed=103968885:i=137899:s2at=10:gtgl=3:kws=precedence:add=on:bd=preordered:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/137899Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056127)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=3205657529:i=140167_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/140167Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056131)dis-1002_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:fd=off:random_seed=3754573273:st=1.5:i=114:aac=none:ins=7:ss=axioms:fsd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/114Mi)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056131)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056130)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056132)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.29/0.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 2.29/0.89  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)------------------------------
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)------------------------------
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056133)------------------------------
% 2.29/0.89  % (2056122)Success in time 0.279 s
% 2.29/0.89  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------