%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : COL103-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:12:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)),
cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : COL103-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 16:17:47 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.60/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.60/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/1.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.60/1.73 % Total time : 1.328s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------