%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL103-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_z,v_x),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)),
cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl_Ortrancl__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : COL103-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:10:35 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 960940 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 960943 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 1385
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1339
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses : 46
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 0.12/0.45 % Processed clauses : 41
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.12/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.12/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % Generated clauses : 14
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 31
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71
% 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9147
% 0.12/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2707
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4884 pages
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.12/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------