↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL110-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.72s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   22 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_yb,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_wa,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_wa),X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_xb(X),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X,v_xb(X),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_w,v_xaa(X),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X,v_xaa(X),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

cnf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X,Y,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(Z,U,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(Z,X),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(U,Y),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).

cnf(9,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_xb(v_yb),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5,cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,v_xb(v_yb),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_w,v_xaa(v_wa),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7,cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_wa,v_xaa(v_wa),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_8,cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb(v_yb),v_xaa(v_wa)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0,11,9]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_wa),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb(v_yb),v_xaa(v_wa)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0,12,10]) ).

cnf(913,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4,33]),43]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : COL110-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:25:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T09:25:23
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T09:25:23
% 0.56/0.72  
% 0.56/0.72  
% 0.56/0.72  #||
% 0.56/0.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.72  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.72  ||#
% 0.56/0.72  
% 0.56/0.72  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.56/0.72  ;      1997 formulas have been input or derived (from 38 formulas).
% 0.56/0.72  ;       913 (46%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.56/0.72  ;          913 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.56/0.72  ; 
% 0.56/0.73  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.003   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (8 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.136  55%   Process new row              (1,857 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.047  19%   Resolution                   (74 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.003   1%   Paramodulation               (37 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (6 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.001   0%   Forward subsumption          (6 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.001   0%   Backward subsumption         (6 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (2 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.022   9%   Forward simplification       (1,857 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.009   4%   Backward simplification      (913 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.027  11%   Other
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.249        Total
% 0.56/0.73  ;     0.251        Real time
% 0.56/0.73  ; 
% 0.56/0.73  ; Term-hash-array has 3,021 terms in all.
% 0.56/0.73  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6 entries (6 at peak, 6 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.73  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 103 nodes (103 at peak, 103 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.73  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 6 calls.
% 0.56/0.73  ;  Retrieved 2 possibly backward subsumed rows in 6 calls.
% 0.56/0.73  ; Path-index has 3,029 entries (3,029 at peak, 3,029 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.73  ; Path-index has 335 nodes (335 at peak, 335 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.73  ; Trie-index has 3,029 entries (3,029 at peak, 3,029 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.73  ; Trie-index has 25,915 nodes (25,915 at peak, 25,915 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.73  ; Retrieved 945 generalization terms in 1,863 calls.
% 0.56/0.73  ; Retrieved 906 instance terms in 906 calls.
% 0.56/0.73  ; Retrieved 41,531 unifiable terms in 1,603 calls.
% 0.56/0.73  ; 
% 0.56/0.73  ; The agenda of rows to process has 124 entries:
% 0.56/0.73  ;     8 with value 28             16 with value 32              20 with value 34
% 0.56/0.73  ;    16 with value 29             64 with value 33
% 0.56/0.73  ; The agenda of rows to give has 875 entries:
% 0.56/0.73  ;    11 with value (4 22)        160 with value (4 28)         288 with value (4 32)
% 0.56/0.73  ;    16 with value (4 24)         32 with value (4 29)         128 with value (4 33)
% 0.56/0.73  ;    32 with value (4 25)        128 with value (4 31)          16 with value (4 34)
% 0.56/0.73  ;    64 with value (4 27)
% 0.56/0.73  Evaluation took:
% 0.56/0.73    0.252 seconds of real time
% 0.56/0.73    0.23702 seconds of user run time
% 0.56/0.73    0.01517 seconds of system run time
% 0.56/0.73    [Run times include 0.022 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.56/0.73    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.56/0.73    0 page faults and
% 0.56/0.73    18,565,096 bytes consed.
% 0.56/0.73  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.73  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T09:25:24
% 0.56/0.73  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.73  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------