↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL116-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AqFRU2JaXO true

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:28 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.64s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem  : COL116-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AqFRU2JaXO true
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:57:53 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.59/0.70  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.59/0.70  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.59/0.70  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.62/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.62/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.64/0.87  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.64/0.87  % BCE start: 33
% 0.64/0.87  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.64/0.87  % PE start: 33
% 0.64/0.87  logic: eq
% 0.64/0.87  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.64/0.87  % done 12 iterations in 0.076s
% 0.64/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.64/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.64/0.87  thf(c_in_type, type, c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(c_Comb_Oparcontract_type, type, c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(v_xb_type, type, v_xb: $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(v_yb_type, type, v_yb: $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(tc_prod_type, type, tc_prod: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(v_z_type, type, v_z: $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(tc_Comb_Ocomb_type, type, tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(c_Pair_type, type, c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 0.64/0.87    (c_in @
% 0.64/0.87     ( c_Pair @
% 0.64/0.87       ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.64/0.87         ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ v_xb @ v_z ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87         ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ v_yb @ v_z ) ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87       V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87     c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ))).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.64/0.87    (~( c_in @
% 0.64/0.87        ( c_Pair @
% 0.64/0.87          ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.64/0.87            ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ v_xb @ v_z ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87            ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ v_yb @ v_z ) ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87          V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87        c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) )),
% 0.64/0.87    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 0.64/0.87      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.64/0.87         ~ (c_in @ 
% 0.64/0.87            (c_Pair @ 
% 0.64/0.87             (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ v_xb @ v_z) @ 
% 0.64/0.87              (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ v_yb @ v_z)) @ 
% 0.64/0.87             X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.64/0.87            c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.64/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0, axiom,
% 0.64/0.87    (c_in @
% 0.64/0.87     ( c_Pair @ V_x @ V_x @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.64/0.87     c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ))).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.64/0.87      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.64/0.87          (c_in @ (c_Pair @ X0 @ X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.64/0.87           c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.64/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0])).
% 0.64/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl109, plain, ($false),
% 0.64/0.87      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.64/0.87  
% 0.64/0.87  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.64/0.87  
% 0.64/0.87  
% 0.64/0.87  % Terminating...
% 0.65/0.93  % Runner terminated.
% 0.65/0.93  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------