↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : COL116-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:37:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.24s
% Output   : Proof 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL116-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.16  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.16  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:42:42 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.17  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.24  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.07/0.24  Axiom 1 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0): c_in(c_Pair(X, X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_0): c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb, v_z)), X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.07/0.24  The goal is true when:
% 0.07/0.24    X = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb, v_z))
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  Proof:
% 0.07/0.24    c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb, v_z)), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb, v_z)), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 0.07/0.24  = { by axiom 1 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) }
% 0.07/0.24    true
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------