↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COL117-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.39s 1.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  17   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f31,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__3_0) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).

fof(f1503,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f1504,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f1505,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f1506,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

tcf(c_1456,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1503]) ).

tcf(c_1457,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1504]) ).

tcf(c_1458,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1505]) ).

tcf(c_1459,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1506]) ).

tcf(c_1462,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_1463,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_1991,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1463,c_1459]) ).

tcf(c_2008,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1462,c_1991]) ).

tcf(c_2044,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1462,c_2008]) ).

tcf(c_2045,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2044,c_1458,c_1456]) ).

tcf(c_2046,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1462,c_2045]) ).

tcf(c_2047,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2046,c_1457,c_1456]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL117-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:39:52 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.45  % Proving...
% 3.39/1.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.39/1.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.39/1.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % 
% 3.39/1.30  % clauses                               23
% 3.39/1.30  % conjectures                           4
% 3.39/1.30  % EPR                                   1
% 3.39/1.30  % Horn                                  23
% 3.39/1.30  % unary                                 13
% 3.39/1.30  % binary                                9
% 3.39/1.30  % lits                                  34
% 3.39/1.30  % lits eq                               13
% 3.39/1.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.39/1.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.39/1.30  % fd_cond                               2
% 3.39/1.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 3.39/1.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ 
% 3.39/1.30  % Current options:
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.39/1.30  % 
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.39/1.30  
% 3.39/1.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------