↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COL117-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.96s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  28 unt;  10 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  136 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  32   ~;  22   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;  11 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  33   !;   0   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__3_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_82,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_83,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(iPr_def_10,v_y_Ha),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_84,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(iPr_def_11,v_w),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_85,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_86,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_87,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_88,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_89,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_90,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_91,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_16,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_87,c_86,c_88,c_85,c_82,c_83,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(iPr_def_17,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_89]) ).

tcf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(iPr_def_18,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_90]) ).

tcf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(iPr_def_19,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_269,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(iPr_def_10,X0),X1),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,X1),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X1)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_269]) ).

tcf(c_296,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(iPr_def_11,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,X0)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_270]) ).

tcf(c_304,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_12,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_296]) ).

tcf(c_305,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_16,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_304,c_92]) ).

tcf(c_317,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_328,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_14,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_317]) ).

tcf(c_329,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_15,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_317]) ).

tcf(c_332,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_16,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_15,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_14,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_317]) ).

tcf(c_835,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_15,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_14,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_305]) ).

tcf(c_908,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_15,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_328,c_835]) ).

tcf(c_909,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(iPr_def_19,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_18,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_15,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_908,c_90,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_910,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_15,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_909,c_95,c_94]) ).

tcf(c_911,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_910]) ).

tcf(c_912,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(iPr_def_19,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_17,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_911,c_89,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_913,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_912,c_95,c_93]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL117-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:39:49 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.42  
% 0.08/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.08/0.42  
% 0.08/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.08/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.96/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.96/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.96/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.96/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % 
% 1.96/1.28  % clauses                               16
% 1.96/1.28  % conjectures                           4
% 1.96/1.28  % EPR                                   3
% 1.96/1.28  % Horn                                  16
% 1.96/1.28  % unary                                 14
% 1.96/1.28  % binary                                1
% 1.96/1.28  % lits                                  19
% 1.96/1.28  % lits eq                               10
% 1.96/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.96/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.96/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.96/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.96/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.96/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.96/1.28  % 
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.96/1.28  
% 1.96/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------