↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : COL118-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:37:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.29s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL118-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:40:32 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.29  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.29  Axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.21/0.29  Axiom 2 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0): c_in(c_Pair(X, X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.21/0.29  Axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_0): c_in(c_Pair(v_x, v_ya, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.21/0.29  Axiom 4 (cls_conjecture_1): c_in(c_Pair(v_z, v_w, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.21/0.29  Axiom 5 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0): ifeq(c_in(c_Pair(X, Y, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true, ifeq(c_in(c_Pair(Z, W, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X, Z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(Y, W), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true), true) = true.
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_2): tuple(c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb))) = tuple(true, true).
% 0.21/0.29  The goal is true when:
% 0.21/0.29    X = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w)
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  Proof:
% 0.21/0.29    tuple(c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.21/0.29  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.29    tuple(ifeq(true, true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.21/0.30  = { by axiom 4 (cls_conjecture_1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.30    tuple(ifeq(c_in(c_Pair(v_z, v_w, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.21/0.30  = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.30    tuple(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(c_in(c_Pair(v_z, v_w, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true), true), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.21/0.30  = { by axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_0) R->L }
% 0.21/0.30    tuple(ifeq(c_in(c_Pair(v_x, v_ya, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true, ifeq(c_in(c_Pair(v_z, v_w, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x, v_z), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), true), true), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.21/0.30  = { by axiom 5 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) }
% 0.21/0.30    tuple(true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya, v_w), tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.21/0.30  = { by axiom 2 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) }
% 0.21/0.30    tuple(true, true)
% 0.21/0.30  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.30  
% 0.21/0.30  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------