↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : COL118-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:38:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   8   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f4,f3]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5,f13]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f1]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL118-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:39:55 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.23  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.27  % (232869)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1570385940:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-232869-232876"...
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.19/0.27  % (232876)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.27  % (232869)Success in time 0.029 s
% 0.19/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------