%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.61s 1.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 17 unt; 5 def)
% Number of atoms : 80 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 6 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_78,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_79,definition,
iPr_def_11 = tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_80,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_81,definition,
iPr_def_13 = c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_82,definition,
iPr_def_14 = c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_10,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_80,c_79,c_78]) ).
tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
c_in(iPr_def_13,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_81]) ).
tcf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
c_in(iPr_def_14,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_82]) ).
tcf(c_235,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_79]) ).
tcf(c_237,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X2,X0),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_79]) ).
tcf(c_247,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_10,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_237]) ).
tcf(c_274,plain,
( c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_247]) ).
tcf(c_276,plain,
( c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_14,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_13,c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_81,c_82]) ).
tcf(c_277,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_276,c_85,c_84]) ).
tcf(c_282,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_12,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,iPr_def_11),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_277,c_83]) ).
tcf(c_283,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_235]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:40:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44 % Proving...
% 1.61/1.28 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.61/1.28 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.61/1.28 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 %
% 1.61/1.28 % clauses 10
% 1.61/1.28 % conjectures 3
% 1.61/1.28 % EPR 2
% 1.61/1.28 % Horn 10
% 1.61/1.28 % unary 8
% 1.61/1.28 % binary 1
% 1.61/1.28 % lits 13
% 1.61/1.28 % lits eq 5
% 1.61/1.28 % fd_pure 0
% 1.61/1.28 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.61/1.28 % fd_cond 0
% 1.61/1.28 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.61/1.28 % AC symbols 0
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------
% 1.61/1.28 % Current options:
% 1.61/1.28 % ------
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 %
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 1.61/1.28 %
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.61/1.28
% 1.61/1.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------