↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL119-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0ZRjrSVtc true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:28 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.96s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem  : COL119-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0ZRjrSVtc true
% 0.14/0.38  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 11:00:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.38  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.38  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.37/0.73  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.37/0.73  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.37/0.73  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.37/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.37/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.37/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.37/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.37/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.37/0.85  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.37/0.85  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.37/0.96  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.37/0.96  % BCE start: 39
% 0.37/0.96  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.37/0.96  % PE start: 39
% 0.37/0.96  logic: eq
% 0.37/0.96  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.37/0.96  % done 22 iterations in 0.085s
% 0.37/0.96  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.37/0.96  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.96  thf(c_in_type, type, c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(c_Comb_Oparcontract_type, type, c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(v_y_H_type, type, v_y_H: $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(v_x_H_type, type, v_x_H: $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(tc_prod_type, type, tc_prod: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(v_w_type, type, v_w: $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(tc_Comb_Ocomb_type, type, tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(c_Pair_type, type, c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(cls_conjecture_2, conjecture,
% 0.37/0.96    (~( ( ~( c_in @
% 0.37/0.96             ( c_Pair @
% 0.37/0.96               ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.37/0.96                 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H ) @ v_w ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96               V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96             c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) | 
% 0.37/0.96        ( ~( c_in @
% 0.37/0.96             ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96             c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) ))).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.37/0.96    (( ~( c_in @
% 0.37/0.96          ( c_Pair @
% 0.37/0.96            ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.37/0.96              ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H ) @ v_w ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96            V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96          c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) | 
% 0.37/0.96     ( ~( c_in @
% 0.37/0.96          ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96          c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) )),
% 0.37/0.96    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_2])).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zip_derived_cl36, plain,
% 0.37/0.96      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.37/0.96         (~ (c_in @ 
% 0.37/0.96             (c_Pair @ 
% 0.37/0.96              (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ 
% 0.37/0.96               (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H) @ v_w) @ 
% 0.37/0.96              X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.37/0.96             c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 0.37/0.96          | ~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_y_H @ X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.37/0.96               c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb)))),
% 0.37/0.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0, axiom,
% 0.37/0.96    (c_in @
% 0.37/0.96     ( c_Pair @
% 0.37/0.96       ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.37/0.96         ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ V_x ) @ V_y ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96       V_x @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96     c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ))).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.37/0.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.37/0.96          (c_in @ 
% 0.37/0.96           (c_Pair @ 
% 0.37/0.96            (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ 
% 0.37/0.96             (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ X0) @ X1) @ 
% 0.37/0.96            X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.37/0.96           c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.37/0.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0])).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zip_derived_cl146, plain,
% 0.37/0.96      (~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.37/0.96          c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.37/0.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl36, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 0.37/0.96    (~( c_in @
% 0.37/0.96        ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96        c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ))).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.37/0.96    (c_in @
% 0.37/0.96     ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.37/0.96     c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb )),
% 0.37/0.96    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 0.37/0.96      ( (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.37/0.96         c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.37/0.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.37/0.96  thf(zip_derived_cl147, plain, ($false),
% 0.37/0.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl146, zip_derived_cl37])).
% 0.37/0.96  
% 0.37/0.96  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.96  
% 0.37/0.96  
% 0.37/0.96  % Terminating...
% 1.44/1.07  % Runner terminated.
% 1.74/1.08  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------