%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : COL119-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:56:35 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.43s 11.17s
% Output : Refutation 1.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 88 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 11 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 ^; 6 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(c_Pair_decl,type,
c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(v_y_H_decl,type,
v_y_H: $i ).
thf(v_x_H_decl,type,
v_x_H: $i ).
thf(tc_Comb_Ocomb_decl,type,
tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i ).
thf(c_Comb_Oparcontract_decl,type,
c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i ).
thf(tc_prod_decl,type,
tc_prod: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D_decl,type,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK_decl,type,
c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i ).
thf(v_w_decl,type,
v_w: $i ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( v_x_H @ ( v_y_H @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
thf(4,plain,
tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( v_x_H @ ( v_y_H @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( A @ ( v_w @ ( v_x_H @ ( c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( A @ ( v_y_H @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
thf(5,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( A @ ( v_w @ ( v_x_H @ ( c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( A @ ( v_y_H @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ ( c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0) ).
thf(7,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_prod ) @ ( c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( tc_Comb_Ocomb @ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ ( c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D ) @ c_Pair ) ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(8,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[4,5,7]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : COL119-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.05/10.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/10.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/10.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/10.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/10.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/10.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/10.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.05/10.34 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:17:04 UTC 2026
% 0.05/10.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.05/10.34 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/10.62 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.09/10.70 % [INFO] Parsing done (81ms).
% 0.09/10.70 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 0.09/10.88 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 0.09/10.89 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 0.09/10.93 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 0.09/10.95 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 0.09/10.95 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 0.09/10.96 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 0.09/10.96 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 1.43/11.17 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 1.43/11.17 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 1.43/11.17 % Time passed: 754ms (effective reasoning time: 464ms)
% 1.43/11.17 % Axioms used in derivation (1): cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0
% 1.43/11.17 % No. of inferences in proof: 7
% 1.43/11.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 754 ms resp. 464 ms w/o parsing
% 1.43/11.19 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.43/11.19 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------