%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : COL119-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:37:30 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.31s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL119-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.20 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.20 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.20 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.20 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.20 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.20 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.20 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.20 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:41:04 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.20 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.31 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.20/0.31
% 0.20/0.31 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.31
% 0.20/0.32 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.32 Axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_1): c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H, v_x_H, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.20/0.32 Axiom 2 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0): c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK, X), Y), X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)) = true.
% 0.20/0.32
% 0.20/0.32 Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_2): tuple(c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H, X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK, v_x_H), v_w), X, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb))) = tuple(true, true).
% 0.20/0.32 The goal is true when:
% 0.20/0.32 X = v_x_H
% 0.20/0.32
% 0.20/0.32 Proof:
% 0.20/0.32 tuple(c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H, v_x_H, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)), c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK, v_x_H), v_w), v_x_H, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.20/0.32 = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_1) }
% 0.20/0.32 tuple(true, c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK, v_x_H), v_w), v_x_H, tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb), c_Comb_Oparcontract, tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb, tc_Comb_Ocomb)))
% 0.20/0.32 = { by axiom 2 (cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0) }
% 0.20/0.32 tuple(true, true)
% 0.20/0.32 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.32
% 0.20/0.32 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------