%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL125+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:43 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 200.66s 29.84s
% Output : Saturation 200.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_7ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_51ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_50]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL125+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:12:35 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 200.66/29.84 % Version: 3.5.1
% 200.66/29.84 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 200.66/29.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2782603 completed with status 1
% 200.66/29.84 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 200.66/29.84 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 200.66/29.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 200.66/29.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 200.66/29.84 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 200.66/29.84 % partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 200.66/29.84 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2782609 completed with status 1
% 200.66/29.84 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 200.66/29.84 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 200.66/29.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 200.66/29.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 200.66/29.84 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 200.66/29.84 % partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 200.66/29.84 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 200.66/29.84 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 200.66/29.84 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 200.66/29.84
% 200.66/29.84 % No proof found!
% 200.66/29.84 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 200.66/29.84 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 200.66/29.84 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 200.66/29.84 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Initial clauses : 11
% 200.66/29.84 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 200.66/29.84 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 200.66/29.84 % Processed clauses : 6449
% 200.66/29.84 % ...of these trivial : 1787
% 200.66/29.84 % ...subsumed : 3024
% 200.66/29.84 % ...remaining for further processing : 1638
% 200.66/29.84 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Backward-subsumed : 16
% 200.66/29.84 % Backward-rewritten : 1611
% 200.66/29.84 % Generated clauses : 557233
% 200.66/29.84 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 537168
% 200.66/29.84 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Paramodulations : 557233
% 200.66/29.84 % Factorizations : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % NegExts : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Total rewrite steps : 330590
% 200.66/29.84 % ...of those cached : 258275
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional check models : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 200.66/29.84 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 200.66/29.84 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 200.66/29.84 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 200.66/29.84 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 200.66/29.84 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 200.66/29.84 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 200.66/29.84 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 200.66/29.84 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Current number of archived clauses : 1637
% 200.66/29.84 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69962
% 200.66/29.84 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % BW rewrite match attempts : 389012
% 200.66/29.84 % BW rewrite match successes : 4103
% 200.66/29.84 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Condensation successes : 0
% 200.66/29.84 % Termbank termtop insertions : 34702858
% 200.66/29.84 % Search garbage collected termcells : 534
% 200.66/29.84
% 200.66/29.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 200.66/29.84 % User time : 27.705 s
% 200.66/29.84 % System time : 0.731 s
% 200.66/29.84 % Total time : 28.436 s
% 200.66/29.84 % Maximum resident set size: 3676 pages
% 200.66/29.84
% 200.66/29.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 200.66/29.84 % User time : 137.869 s
% 200.66/29.84 % System time : 4.184 s
% 200.66/29.84 % Total time : 142.053 s
% 200.66/29.84 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 200.66/29.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------