↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : COM001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:59:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  14   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(direct_success,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ follows(VAR_0,VAR_1)
      | succeeds(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( ~ follows(A,B)
    | succeeds(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[direct_success]) ).

fof(transition_3_to_8,axiom,
    follows(p8,p3),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_8) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    follows(p8,p3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transition_3_to_8]) ).

fof(state_8,axiom,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[state_8]) ).

fof(goto_success,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ labels(VAR_2,VAR_0)
      | ~ has(VAR_1,goto(VAR_2))
      | succeeds(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( ~ labels(C,A)
    | ~ has(B,goto(C))
    | succeeds(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[goto_success]) ).

fof(label_state_3,axiom,
    labels(loop,p3),
    file('theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    labels(loop,p3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[label_state_3]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( ~ labels(loop,A)
    | succeeds(A,p8) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    succeeds(p3,p8),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    succeeds(p8,p3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_2]) ).

fof(prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3,axiom,
    ~ succeeds(p3,p3),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ~ succeeds(p3,p3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3]) ).

fof(transitivity_of_success,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ succeeds(VAR_2,VAR_1)
      | ~ succeeds(VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | succeeds(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ succeeds(C,B)
    | ~ succeeds(A,C)
    | succeeds(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_success]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ succeeds(p8,A)
    | succeeds(p3,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    succeeds(p3,p3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : COM001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:20:52 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.45  % Process 2936617 was started by sandbox2 on n002,
% 0.15/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 23:20:52 2026
% 0.15/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.46  
% 0.15/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.15/0.47  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.15/0.47  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.15/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.15/0.47  % Given clauses 5.
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------