↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COM001-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n36I6Wr95X true

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:31 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : COM001-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n36I6Wr95X true
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:48:08 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.32  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.32  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.32  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.33  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.63  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.63  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.63  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.61/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.76  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.61/0.76  % BCE start: 11
% 0.61/0.76  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.61/0.76  % PE start: 11
% 0.61/0.76  logic: neq
% 0.61/0.76  % PE eliminated: 5
% 0.61/0.76  % done 7 iterations in 0.010s
% 0.61/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.61/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.76  thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(follows_type, type, follows: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(loop_type, type, loop: $i).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(p8_type, type, p8: $i).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(goto_type, type, goto: $i > $i).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(succeeds_type, type, succeeds: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(labels_type, type, labels: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(has_type, type, has: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3, conjecture, (succeeds @ p3 @ p3)).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( succeeds @ p3 @ p3 )),
% 0.61/0.76    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (~ (succeeds @ p3 @ p3)),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(state_8, axiom, (has @ p8 @ ( goto @ loop ))).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, ( (has @ p8 @ (goto @ loop))),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [state_8])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(label_state_3, axiom, (labels @ loop @ p3)).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (labels @ loop @ p3)),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [label_state_3])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(goto_success, axiom,
% 0.61/0.76    (( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) | 
% 0.61/0.76     ( ~( has @ Start_state @ ( goto @ Label ) ) ) | 
% 0.61/0.76     ( ~( labels @ Label @ Goal_state ) ))).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.61/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.76         ( (succeeds @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.61/0.76          | ~ (has @ X1 @ (goto @ X2))
% 0.61/0.76          | ~ (labels @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [goto_success])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.61/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (has @ X0 @ (goto @ loop)) |  (succeeds @ p3 @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.61/0.76                [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, ( (succeeds @ p3 @ p8)),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.61/0.76                [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(transitivity_of_success, axiom,
% 0.61/0.76    (( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) | 
% 0.61/0.76     ( ~( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Intermediate_state ) ) | 
% 0.61/0.76     ( ~( succeeds @ Intermediate_state @ Start_state ) ))).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.61/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.76         ( (succeeds @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.61/0.76          | ~ (succeeds @ X0 @ X2)
% 0.61/0.76          | ~ (succeeds @ X2 @ X1))),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_success])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.61/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (succeeds @ p8 @ X0) |  (succeeds @ p3 @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(transition_3_to_8, axiom, (follows @ p8 @ p3)).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ( (follows @ p8 @ p3)),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transition_3_to_8])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(direct_success, axiom,
% 0.61/0.76    (( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) | 
% 0.61/0.76     ( ~( follows @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) ))).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.61/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (succeeds @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (follows @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [direct_success])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, ( (succeeds @ p8 @ p3)),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.61/0.76                [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, ( (succeeds @ p3 @ p3)),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.61/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain, ($false),
% 0.61/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.61/0.76  
% 0.61/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.76  
% 0.61/0.76  
% 0.61/0.76  % Terminating...
% 0.67/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.72/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------