↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : COM002-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:57:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.10s 12.08s
% Output   : Refutation 3.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  31 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  170 (  16   ~;  12   |;   0   &; 142   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   27 (  26 usr;  17 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0   ^;  22   !;   0   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(fails_decl,type,
    fails: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p3_decl,type,
    p3: $i ).

thf(follows_decl,type,
    follows: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p7_decl,type,
    p7: $i ).

thf(p6_decl,type,
    p6: $i ).

thf(has_decl,type,
    has: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p4_decl,type,
    p4: $i ).

thf(goto_decl,type,
    goto: $i > $i ).

thf(out_decl,type,
    out: $i ).

thf(assign_decl,type,
    assign: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(register_j_decl,type,
    register_j: $i ).

thf(plus_decl,type,
    plus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n1_decl,type,
    n1: $i ).

thf(p2_decl,type,
    p2: $i ).

thf(p1_decl,type,
    p1: $i ).

thf(register_k_decl,type,
    register_k: $i ).

thf(times_decl,type,
    times: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n2_decl,type,
    n2: $i ).

thf(p8_decl,type,
    p8: $i ).

thf(n0_decl,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(loop_decl,type,
    loop: $i ).

thf(p5_decl,type,
    p5: $i ).

thf(labels_decl,type,
    labels: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ifthen_decl,type,
    ifthen: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(equal_function_decl,type,
    equal_function: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n_decl,type,
    n: $i ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ifthen ) @ ( B @ has ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conditional_success) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ ifthen ) @ ( B @ has ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    p3 @ ( loop @ labels ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

thf(32,plain,
    p3 @ ( loop @ labels ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ labels ) )
      | ~ ( C @ goto @ ( B @ has ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( C @ labels ) )
      | ~ ( C @ goto @ ( B @ has ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    p2 @ ( p3 @ follows ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_2_to_3) ).

thf(31,plain,
    p2 @ ( p3 @ follows ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    p4 @ ( p5 @ follows ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_4_to_5) ).

thf(30,plain,
    p4 @ ( p5 @ follows ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    p1 @ ( p2 @ follows ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_1_to_2) ).

thf(24,plain,
    p1 @ ( p2 @ follows ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    p4 @ ( n @ ( register_j @ equal_function ) @ ifthen ) @ ( p3 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_3) ).

thf(37,plain,
    p4 @ ( n @ ( register_j @ equal_function ) @ ifthen ) @ ( p3 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    register_k @ ( n2 @ times ) @ ( register_k @ assign ) @ ( p6 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_6) ).

thf(25,plain,
    register_k @ ( n2 @ times ) @ ( register_k @ assign ) @ ( p6 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    p3 @ ( p3 @ fails ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

thf(20,plain,
    p3 @ ( p3 @ fails ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    loop @ goto @ ( p8 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

thf(29,plain,
    loop @ goto @ ( p8 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    p6 @ ( p7 @ follows ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_6_to_7) ).

thf(21,plain,
    p6 @ ( p7 @ follows ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( C @ fails ) )
      | ( C @ ( A @ fails ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( C @ fails ) )
      | ( C @ ( A @ fails ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    n0 @ ( register_j @ assign ) @ ( p1 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_1) ).

thf(28,plain,
    n0 @ ( register_j @ assign ) @ ( p1 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ follows ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ follows ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ fails ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    out @ goto @ ( p4 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_4) ).

thf(22,plain,
    out @ goto @ ( p4 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    n1 @ ( register_k @ assign ) @ ( p2 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_2) ).

thf(27,plain,
    n1 @ ( register_k @ assign ) @ ( p2 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    p3 @ ( p6 @ follows ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_6) ).

thf(40,plain,
    p3 @ ( p6 @ follows ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    p7 @ ( p8 @ follows ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_7_to_8) ).

thf(26,plain,
    p7 @ ( p8 @ follows ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    n1 @ ( register_j @ plus ) @ ( register_j @ assign ) @ ( p7 @ has ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_7) ).

thf(23,plain,
    n1 @ ( register_j @ plus ) @ ( register_j @ assign ) @ ( p7 @ has ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[41,32,35,31,30,24,37,25,20,29,21,33,28,38,22,27,40,26,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM002-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/10.63  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/10.63  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/10.63  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/10.63  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/10.63  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/10.63  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/10.63  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/10.63  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:21:36 UTC 2026
% 0.14/10.63  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/10.63  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.00/11.22  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.19/11.39  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (170ms). 
% 1.37/11.40  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.58/11.59  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.58/11.59  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.78/11.63  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 18 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.78/11.66  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 18 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.78/11.68  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.78/11.68  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.78/11.68  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.10/12.08  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.10/12.08  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.10/12.08  % Time passed: 1305ms (effective reasoning time: 679ms)
% 3.10/12.08  % Axioms used in derivation (18): transition_3_to_6, state_4, transition_2_to_3, state_8, label_state_3, state_3, state_2, goto_success, state_1, transitivity_of_success, state_7, transition_4_to_5, transition_1_to_2, transition_6_to_7, conditional_success, direct_success, transition_7_to_8, state_6
% 3.10/12.08  % No. of inferences in proof: 39
% 3.10/12.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1305 ms resp. 679 ms w/o parsing
% 3.31/12.13  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.31/12.13  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------