↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : COM002_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:40:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.24s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  19 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  24   ~;  22   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    7 (   6 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   22 (  22 usr;  16 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (  35   !;   0   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    state: $tType ).

tff(type_def_6,type,
    label: $tType ).

tff(type_def_7,type,
    statement: $tType ).

tff(type_def_8,type,
    register: $tType ).

tff(type_def_9,type,
    number: $tType ).

tff(type_def_10,type,
    boolean: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    p1: state ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    p2: state ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    p3: state ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    p4: state ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    p5: state ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    p6: state ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    p7: state ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    p8: state ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    n: number ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    n0: number ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    n1: number ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    n2: number ).

tff(func_def_12,type,
    register_j: register ).

tff(func_def_13,type,
    register_k: register ).

tff(func_def_14,type,
    out: label ).

tff(func_def_15,type,
    loop: label ).

tff(func_def_16,type,
    equal_function: ( register * number ) > boolean ).

tff(func_def_17,type,
    assign: ( register * number ) > statement ).

tff(func_def_18,type,
    goto: label > statement ).

tff(func_def_19,type,
    ifthen: ( boolean * state ) > statement ).

tff(func_def_20,type,
    plus: ( register * number ) > number ).

tff(func_def_21,type,
    times: ( number * register ) > number ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    follows: ( state * state ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    fails: ( state * state ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    labels: ( label * state ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_4,type,
    has: ( state * statement ) > $o ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ~ ( fails(X1,X0)
        & follows(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( fails(X2,X1)
     => ( fails(X2,X0)
        | fails(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: label,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ~ ( fails(X2,X1)
        & has(X1,goto(X0))
        & labels(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

tff(f8,axiom,
    labels(loop,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

tff(f13,axiom,
    follows(p6,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_6) ).

tff(f15,axiom,
    follows(p7,p6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_6_to_7) ).

tff(f17,axiom,
    follows(p8,p7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_7_to_8) ).

tff(f18,axiom,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

tff(f19,conjecture,
    ~ fails(p3,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

tff(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ fails(p3,p3),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    fails(p3,p3),
    inference(flattening,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X1,X0)
      | ~ follows(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( fails(X2,X0)
      | fails(X0,X1)
      | ~ fails(X2,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( fails(X2,X0)
      | fails(X0,X1)
      | ~ fails(X2,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f23]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: label,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X2,X1)
      | ~ has(X1,goto(X0))
      | ~ labels(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X1,X0)
      | ~ follows(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: state,X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X2,X1)
      | fails(X0,X1)
      | fails(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: state,X0: label,X1: state] :
      ( ~ has(X1,goto(X0))
      | ~ fails(X2,X1)
      | ~ labels(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    labels(loop,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    follows(p6,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    follows(p7,p6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f43,plain,
    follows(p8,p7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f44,plain,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    fails(p3,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f48,plain,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ( fails(X0,p3)
      | fails(p3,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f28,f45]) ).

tff(f52,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( fails(X0,p3)
      | fails(X1,X0)
      | fails(p3,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f48,f28]) ).

tff(f56,plain,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ( ~ labels(loop,X0)
      | ~ fails(X0,p8) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29,f44]) ).

tff(f59,plain,
    ~ fails(p3,p8),
    inference(resolution,[],[f56,f34]) ).

tff(f68,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ follows(X0,X1)
      | fails(p3,X0)
      | fails(X1,p3) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f52,f27]) ).

tff(f94,plain,
    ( fails(p3,p8)
    | fails(p7,p3) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f68,f43]) ).

tff(f95,plain,
    fails(p7,p3),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f94,f59]) ).

tff(f115,plain,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ( fails(X0,p3)
      | fails(p7,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f95,f28]) ).

tff(f210,plain,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ( ~ follows(X0,p3)
      | fails(p7,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f115,f27]) ).

tff(f251,plain,
    fails(p7,p6),
    inference(resolution,[],[f210,f39]) ).

tff(f254,plain,
    ~ follows(p7,p6),
    inference(resolution,[],[f251,f27]) ).

tff(f255,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f254,f41]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : COM002_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.17  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:42:32 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.20  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.20  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218122)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1107302241:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1218122-1218132"...
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218132)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.08/0.24  % (1218122)Success in time 0.024 s
% 0.08/0.24  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------