↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COM002_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:04:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.02s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  25 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  36   ~;  31   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   29 (  29 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  39   !;   0   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    p1: state ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    follows: ( state * state ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    fails: ( state * state ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    labels: ( state * label ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_4,type,
    has: ( statement * state ) > $o ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    p6: state ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    p7: state ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    p8: state ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    n: number ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    n0: number ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    n1: number ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    n2: number ).

tff(func_def_12,type,
    register_j: register ).

tff(func_def_13,type,
    register_k: register ).

tff(func_def_14,type,
    out: label ).

tff(func_def_15,type,
    loop: label ).

tff(func_def_16,type,
    equal_function: ( number * register ) > boolean ).

tff(func_def_17,type,
    assign: ( number * register ) > statement ).

tff(func_def_18,type,
    goto: label > statement ).

tff(func_def_19,type,
    ifthen: ( state * boolean ) > statement ).

tff(func_def_20,type,
    plus: ( number * register ) > number ).

tff(func_def_21,type,
    times: ( register * number ) > number ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ~ ( follows(X1,X0)
        & fails(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( fails(X2,X1)
     => ( fails(X0,X1)
        | fails(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: label,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ~ ( labels(X0,X2)
        & has(X1,goto(X0))
        & fails(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

tff(f8,axiom,
    labels(loop,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

tff(f13,axiom,
    follows(p6,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_6) ).

tff(f15,axiom,
    follows(p7,p6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_6_to_7) ).

tff(f17,axiom,
    follows(p8,p7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_7_to_8) ).

tff(f18,axiom,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

tff(f19,conjecture,
    ~ fails(p3,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

tff(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ fails(p3,p3),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    fails(p3,p3),
    inference(flattening,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ follows(X1,X0)
      | ~ fails(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X2,X1)
      | fails(X0,X1)
      | fails(X2,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X2,X1)
      | fails(X0,X1)
      | fails(X2,X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f23]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: label,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( ~ labels(X0,X2)
      | ~ has(X1,goto(X0))
      | ~ fails(X2,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ follows(X1,X0)
      | ~ fails(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: state,X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X2,X1)
      | fails(X0,X1)
      | fails(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: state,X0: label,X1: state] :
      ( ~ labels(X0,X2)
      | ~ has(X1,goto(X0))
      | ~ fails(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    labels(loop,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    follows(p6,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    follows(p7,p6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f43,plain,
    follows(p8,p7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f44,plain,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    fails(p3,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state,X1_state: state] :
      ( ~ fails(X0_state,X1_state)
      | ~ follows(X0_state,X1_state) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state,X1_state: state,X2_state: state] :
      ( fails(X2_state,X1_state)
      | fails(X0_state,X2_state)
      | ~ fails(X0_state,X1_state) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state,X0_label: label,X1_state: state] :
      ( ~ labels(X0_label,X1_state)
      | ~ fails(X1_state,X0_state)
      | ~ has(X0_state,goto(X0_label)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    labels(loop,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    follows(p6,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    follows(p7,p6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    follows(p8,p7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    fails(p3,p3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_121,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state] :
      ( ~ fails(p3,X0_state)
      | ~ has(X0_state,goto(loop)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_143,plain,
    ~ fails(p6,p3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ~ fails(p7,p6),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ~ fails(p8,p7),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_165,plain,
    ~ fails(p3,p8),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_121]) ).

tcf(c_201,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state] :
      ( fails(p6,p3)
      | fails(X0_state,p6)
      | ~ fails(X0_state,p3) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_202,plain,
    ( fails(p6,p3)
    | fails(p3,p6)
    | ~ fails(p3,p3) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_201]) ).

tcf(c_203,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state] :
      ( fails(p7,p6)
      | fails(X0_state,p7)
      | ~ fails(X0_state,p6) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_204,plain,
    ( fails(p7,p6)
    | fails(p3,p7)
    | ~ fails(p3,p6) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_203]) ).

tcf(c_205,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state] :
      ( fails(p8,p7)
      | fails(X0_state,p8)
      | ~ fails(X0_state,p7) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_206,plain,
    ( fails(p8,p7)
    | fails(p3,p8)
    | ~ fails(p3,p7) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_205]) ).

tcf(c_207,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_204,c_202,c_165,c_151,c_147,c_143,c_67]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM002_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:42:55 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.02/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.02/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.02/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.02/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 2.02/1.28  % 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 2.02/1.28   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % 
% 2.02/1.28  % clauses                               10
% 2.02/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 2.02/1.28  % EPR                                   10
% 2.02/1.28  % Horn                                  9
% 2.02/1.28  % unary                                 9
% 2.02/1.28  % binary                                0
% 2.02/1.28  % lits                                  12
% 2.02/1.28  % lits eq                               0
% 2.02/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.02/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.02/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.02/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.02/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.02/1.28  % Current options:
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.02/1.28  % 
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.02/1.28  
% 2.02/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------