%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : COM002_20 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:11:55 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.61s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_18ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_29ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X4: label,X2: state,X1: state] :
( ~ labels(X4,X1)
| ~ has(X2,goto(X4))
| ~ fails(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
has(p8,goto(loop)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_8]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
has(p4,goto(out)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_4]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
! [X1: state] :
( ~ fails(X1,p8)
| ~ labels(loop,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
labels(loop,p3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[label_state_3]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_27,plain,
! [X5: boolean,X2: state,X1: state] :
( ~ has(X2,ifthen(X5,X1))
| ~ fails(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
has(p3,ifthen(equal_function(register_j,n),p4)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_3]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
! [X1: state] :
( ~ fails(X1,p4)
| ~ labels(out,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_30,plain,
! [X1: state,X3: state,X2: state] :
( ~ fails(X1,X2)
| fails(X3,X2)
| fails(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_31,plain,
! [X1: state,X2: state] :
( ~ follows(X1,X2)
| ~ fails(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
~ fails(p3,p8),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
~ fails(p4,p3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
has(p7,assign(register_j,plus(register_j,n1))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_7]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
has(p6,assign(register_k,times(n2,register_k))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_6]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
has(p2,assign(register_k,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_2]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
has(p1,assign(register_j,n0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_1]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
follows(p8,p7),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_7_to_8]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
follows(p7,p6),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_6_to_7]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
follows(p6,p3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_3_to_6]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
follows(p5,p4),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_4_to_5]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
follows(p3,p2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_2_to_3]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
follows(p2,p1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_1_to_2]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : COM002_20 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.53 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.53 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.53 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:15:31 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2106225 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.61 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.15/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.61 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.61 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2106230 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.61 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.61 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.61
% 0.15/0.61 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.61 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.61 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 50
% 0.15/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Initial clauses : 50
% 0.15/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 32
% 0.15/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.15/0.61 % Processed clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.15/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.15/0.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.15/0.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24
% 0.15/0.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.15/0.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.15/0.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1076
% 0.15/0.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 66
% 0.15/0.61
% 0.15/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.61 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.61 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.61 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.15/0.61
% 0.15/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.61 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.61 % System time : 0.020 s
% 0.15/0.61 % Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.15/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------