↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : COM003+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:57:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.37s 3.32s
% Output   : Refutation 6.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  232 (  11   ~;   0   |;  45   &; 149   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  27  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (  10 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0   ^;  32   !;   9   ?;  41   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(algorithm_decl,type,
    algorithm: $i > $o ).

thf(program_decl,type,
    program: $i > $o ).

thf(decides_decl,type,
    decides: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(halts2_decl,type,
    halts2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(halts3_decl,type,
    halts3: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(outputs_decl,type,
    outputs: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(good_decl,type,
    good: $i ).

thf(bad_decl,type,
    bad: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ algorithm ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [A: $i] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ program )
             => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ algorithm ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [A: $i] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ program )
             => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ algorithm ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ algorithm ) )
   => ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ program ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ algorithm ) )
   => ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ program ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ program ) )
     => ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
              & ( B @ program ) )
           => ( ( bad @ ( A @ outputs ) )
              & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) )
          & ( ( ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
              & ( B @ program ) )
           => ( ( good @ ( A @ outputs ) )
              & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( B @ program )
           => ! [C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ decides ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ program ) )
     => ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
              & ( B @ program ) )
           => ( ( bad @ ( A @ outputs ) )
              & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) )
          & ( ( ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
              & ( B @ program ) )
           => ( ( good @ ( A @ outputs ) )
              & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
                & ( B @ program ) )
             => ( ( bad @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) )
            & ( ( ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
                & ( B @ program ) )
             => ( ( good @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ program ) )
     => ? [B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( ( ( bad @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                  & ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) )
                  & ( C @ program ) )
               => ( ( bad @ ( B @ outputs ) )
                  & ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) ) ) )
              & ( ( ( good @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                  & ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) )
                  & ( C @ program ) )
               => ~ ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) ) ) )
          & ( B @ program ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( ~ ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
                & ( B @ program ) )
             => ( ( bad @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) )
            & ( ( ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) )
                & ( B @ program ) )
             => ( ( good @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                & ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ program ) )
     => ? [B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( ( ( bad @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                  & ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) )
                  & ( C @ program ) )
               => ( ( bad @ ( B @ outputs ) )
                  & ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) ) ) )
              & ( ( ( good @ ( A @ outputs ) )
                  & ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ halts3 ) ) )
                  & ( C @ program ) )
               => ~ ( C @ ( B @ halts2 ) ) ) )
          & ( B @ program ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(128,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,11,17,28]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM003+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.40  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:19:09 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.32/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.85/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (287ms). 
% 1.85/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.54/2.01  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.54/2.02  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.79/2.11  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.98/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.98/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.98/2.19  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.98/2.19  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 6.37/3.32  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 6.37/3.32  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 6.37/3.32  % Time passed: 2700ms (effective reasoning time: 1729ms)
% 6.37/3.32  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 6.37/3.32  % Axioms used in derivation (3): p1, p2, p3
% 6.37/3.32  % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 6.37/3.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2700 ms resp. 1729 ms w/o parsing
% 6.37/3.36  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.37/3.36  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------