↑ Up

Otter---3.3.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : COM004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:48:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.66s 1.89s
% Output   : Refutation 1.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   4 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( failure_node(parent_of(A,B),or(C,D))
    | ~ failure_node(A,or(C,E))
    | ~ failure_node(B,or(D,F))
    | ~ contradictory(E,F)
    | ~ siblings(A,B) ),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ failure_node(A,or(empty,empty)),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    contradictory(A,negate(A)),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    siblings(left_child_of(A),right_child_of(A)),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    n_left = left_child_of(n),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    left_child_of(n) = n_left,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[9])]),
    [iquote('copy,9,flip.1')] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    n_right = right_child_of(n),
    file('COM004-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    right_child_of(n) = n_right,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[12])]),
    [iquote('copy,12,flip.1')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    siblings(n_left,n_right),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,10]),14]),
    [iquote('para_into,6.1.1,10.1.1,demod,14')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(empty,empty)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1,7,5,15]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1,7,5,15')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[16,2]),
    [iquote('binary,16.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : COM004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:58:22 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.66/1.89  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.66/1.89  The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 1.66/1.89  Wed Jul 27 06:58:22 2022
% 1.66/1.89  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 25085.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.66/1.89  set(auto).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.66/1.89  clear(print_given).
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  list(usable).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] A=A.
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] failure_node(parent_of(X,Y),or(C,D))| -failure_node(X,or(C,P))| -failure_node(Y,or(D,Q))| -contradictory(P,Q)| -siblings(X,Y).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] contradictory(negate(X),X).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] contradictory(X,negate(X)).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] siblings(left_child_of(X),right_child_of(X)).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] n_left=left_child_of(n).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] n_right=right_child_of(n).
% 1.66/1.89  0 [] -failure_node(Z,or(empty,empty)).
% 1.66/1.89  end_of_list.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.66/1.89  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.66/1.89  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.66/1.89     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ------------> process usable:
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 1 [] failure_node(parent_of(A,B),or(C,D))| -failure_node(A,or(C,E))| -failure_node(B,or(D,F))| -contradictory(E,F)| -siblings(A,B).
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 2 [] -failure_node(A,or(empty,empty)).
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ------------> process sos:
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] A=A.
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 4 [] contradictory(negate(A),A).
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 5 [] contradictory(A,negate(A)).
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] siblings(left_child_of(A),right_child_of(A)).
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 7 [] failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)).
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 8 [] failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))).
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 10 [copy,9,flip.1] left_child_of(n)=n_left.
% 1.66/1.89  ---> New Demodulator: 11 [new_demod,10] left_child_of(n)=n_left.
% 1.66/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 13 [copy,12,flip.1] right_child_of(n)=n_right.
% 1.66/1.89  ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] right_child_of(n)=n_right.
% 1.66/1.89    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,3,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.66/1.89  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 11.
% 1.66/1.89  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 14.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 17 [binary,16.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.66/1.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.66/1.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.66/1.89  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ============ end of search ============
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.66/1.89  clauses given                  9
% 1.66/1.89  clauses generated              7
% 1.66/1.89  clauses kept                  12
% 1.66/1.89  clauses forward subsumed       6
% 1.66/1.89  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.66/1.89  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.66/1.89  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.66/1.89  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.66/1.89  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.66/1.89  
% 1.66/1.89  Process 25085 finished Wed Jul 27 06:58:23 2022
% 1.66/1.89  Otter interrupted
% 1.66/1.89  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------