↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COM004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:04:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.73s 11.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  17 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  29   ~;  26   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0 sgn  41   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ siblings(X0,X1)
      | ~ contradictory(X4,X5)
      | ~ failure_node(X1,or(X3,X5))
      | ~ failure_node(X0,or(X2,X4))
      | failure_node(parent_of(X0,X1),or(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',make_node) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : contradictory(X0,negate(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_contradicts_not_x) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : siblings(left_child_of(X0),right_child_of(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_and_n_right_are_siblings) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_is_atom) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_right_is_not_atom) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    n_left = left_child_of(n),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_equals_left_child_of_n) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    n_right = right_child_of(n),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_right_equals_right_child_of_n) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ~ failure_node(X0,or(empty,empty)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_is_there_an_empty_node) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( failure_node(parent_of(X0,X3),or(X1,X4))
      | ~ siblings(X0,X3)
      | ~ contradictory(X2,X5)
      | ~ failure_node(X3,or(X4,X5))
      | ~ failure_node(X0,or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : contradictory(X0,negate(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : siblings(left_child_of(X0),right_child_of(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    left_child_of(n) = n_left,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    right_child_of(n) = n_right,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ failure_node(X0,or(empty,empty)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
      ( failure_node(parent_of(X1,X2),or(X3,X5))
      | ~ contradictory(X4,X6)
      | ~ failure_node(X2,or(X5,X6))
      | ~ failure_node(X1,or(X3,X4))
      | ( right_child_of(X0) != X2 )
      | ( left_child_of(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_113,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( failure_node(parent_of(left_child_of(X0),right_child_of(X0)),or(X1,X3))
      | ~ contradictory(X2,X4)
      | ~ failure_node(right_child_of(X0),or(X3,X4))
      | ~ failure_node(left_child_of(X0),or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

tcf(c_225,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = or(empty,empty),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_226,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ failure_node(X0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_225]) ).

tcf(c_395,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( failure_node(parent_of(left_child_of(n),right_child_of(n)),or(X2,X0))
      | ~ contradictory(X3,X1)
      | ~ failure_node(n_left,or(X2,X3))
      | ~ failure_node(right_child_of(n),or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_397,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(X0,X2))
      | ~ contradictory(X1,X3)
      | ~ failure_node(n_right,or(X2,X3))
      | ~ failure_node(n_left,or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_395,c_64,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_411,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(empty,X0))
      | ~ contradictory(atom,X1)
      | ~ failure_node(n_right,or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_397]) ).

tcf(c_423,plain,
    ( failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(empty,empty))
    | ~ contradictory(atom,negate(atom)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_411]) ).

tcf(c_425,plain,
    ( failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),iPr_def_10)
    | ~ contradictory(atom,negate(atom)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_423,c_225]) ).

tcf(c_426,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_425,c_226,c_60]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.39  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:43:47 UTC 2026
% 0.14/10.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/10.40  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/10.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.45  
% 0.14/10.45  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/10.45  
% 0.14/10.45  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/10.46  % Proving...
% 1.73/11.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/11.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.73/11.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.73/11.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Proving...
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % 
% 1.73/11.31  % clauses                               9
% 1.73/11.31  % conjectures                           1
% 1.73/11.31  % EPR                                   1
% 1.73/11.31  % Horn                                  9
% 1.73/11.31  % unary                                 8
% 1.73/11.31  % binary                                0
% 1.73/11.31  % lits                                  12
% 1.73/11.31  % lits eq                               3
% 1.73/11.31  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.73/11.31  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.73/11.31  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.73/11.31  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.73/11.31  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ 
% 1.73/11.31  % Current options:
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % ------ Proving...
% 1.73/11.31  % 
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.73/11.31  
% 1.73/11.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------