%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : COM005-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sat Nov 27 18:04:37 EST 2010 % Result : Timeout 300.04s % Output : None % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19171/COM/COM005-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 277] [nf = 0] [nu = 28] [ut = 24] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 1126] [nf = 0] [nu = 159] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 8485] [nf = 6] [nu = 538] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 60010] [nf = 232] [nu = 2173] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 2 secs [nr = 383387] [nf = 3866] [nu = 11812] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 11 secs [nr = 2295302] [nf = 19824] [nu = 72249] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % t = 64 secs [nr = 13990267] [nf = 109442] [nu = 416302] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ... % Entering time slice 2 % Updating parameters ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 27187796] [nf = 247710] [nu = 738147] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 27188645] [nf = 247710] [nu = 738278] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 27196051] [nf = 247728] [nu = 738657] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 27253909] [nf = 248116] [nu = 740292] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 125 secs [nr = 27772661] [nf = 253884] [nu = 750075] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 144 secs [nr = 33028109] [nf = 351944] [nu = 814356] [ut = 44] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % TIME IS UP! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 76993476 % resolvents: 75267233 factors: 1726243 % Number of unit clauses generated: 1219813 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 1.58 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 1 [1] = 23 [2] = 20 % Total = 44 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 1219813 [2] = 26365730 [3] = 30227269 [4] = 12674641 [5] = 5770786 [6] = 620357 % [7] = 114880 % Average size of a generated clause: 3.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] ap_1 (+)2 (-)2 % [1] aq_1 (+)1 (-)3 % [2] ar_1 (+)1 (-)3 % [3] p_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [4] pp_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [5] pqr1_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [6] pqr2_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [7] pqr3_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [8] pqr4_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [9] pr_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [10] q_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [11] qp_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [12] qq_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [13] qrp1_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [14] qrp2_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [15] qrp3_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [16] qrp4_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [17] r_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [18] rpq1_1 (+)0 (-)2 % [19] rpq2_1 (+)0 (-)2 % [20] rpq3_1 (+)0 (-)2 % [21] rpq4_1 (+)0 (-)2 % [22] rq_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [23] rr_1 (+)0 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)4 (-)40 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 44 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 217722961 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 95202456 % Number of successful unifications: 76993476 % Number of unification failures: 14806491 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 10 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 527043235 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2460803976 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 8 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1008489 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 101005 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 4 % Number of states in UCFA table: 67 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 110 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.61 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 60 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 91799967 % ConstructUnitClause() = 1008532 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 1.16 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 256645 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 303 secs % CPU time: 300.00 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------