↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : COM007+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:57:51 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.93s 3.18s
% Output   : Refutation 5.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  112 (   2   ~;   2   |;  10   &;  84   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0   ^;  32   !;   2   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(goal_decl,type,
    goal: $o ).

thf(reflexive_rewrite_decl,type,
    reflexive_rewrite: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(equalish_decl,type,
    equalish: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(rewrite_decl,type,
    rewrite: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',substitution) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ rewrite ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_in_reflexive_rewrite) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ rewrite ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( ( c @ ( a @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
    & ( b @ ( a @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( c @ ( a @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
    & ( b @ ( a @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmtery) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    goal,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_to_be_proved) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ goal,
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ~ goal,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equalish_in_reflexive_rewrite) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ rewrite ) )
        | ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equalish_or_rewrite) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ rewrite ) )
        | ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rewrite ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ rewrite ) ) )
     => ? [D: $i] :
          ( ( D @ ( C @ rewrite ) )
          & ( D @ ( B @ rewrite ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_diamond) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ rewrite ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ rewrite ) ) )
     => ? [D: $i] :
          ( ( D @ ( C @ rewrite ) )
          & ( D @ ( B @ rewrite ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( c @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
        & ( A @ ( b @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) )
     => goal ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_ax) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( c @ reflexive_rewrite ) )
        & ( A @ ( b @ reflexive_rewrite ) ) )
     => goal ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,20,28,13,22,12,26,30,32,17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : COM007+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.21/0.47  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.21/0.47  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:20:45 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.26/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.77/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (278ms). 
% 1.77/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.57/2.14  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.57/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.86/2.27  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 9 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.01/2.31  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 9 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.01/2.36  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 3.01/2.37  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.01/2.38  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.93/3.18  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.93/3.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.93/3.18  % Time passed: 2484ms (effective reasoning time: 1633ms)
% 4.93/3.18  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.93/3.18  % Axioms used in derivation (9): rewrite_in_reflexive_rewrite, rewrite_diamond, assumption, reflexivity, symmtery, equalish_or_rewrite, equalish_in_reflexive_rewrite, substitution, goal_ax
% 4.93/3.18  % No. of inferences in proof: 22
% 4.93/3.18  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2484 ms resp. 1633 ms w/o parsing
% 5.02/3.25  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.02/3.25  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------