↑ Up

Gandalf---c-2.6.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : COM009-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP24350/COM/COM009-1+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 28 #f 4 7)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 4 7)
% (binary-double 11 #f 4 7)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 4 7)
% (binary-order 28 #f 4 7)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
% 
% 
% SOS clause 
% -equal(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(v_^f,t_a),v_^f) | -c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(v_^f,t_a).
% was split for some strategies as: 
% -equal(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(v_^f,t_a),v_^f).
% -c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(v_^f,t_a).
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(1372,40,6,2744,0,12)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 1373 [] equal(X,X).
% 2733 [] equal(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(X,Y),X) | -c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(X,Y).
% 2734 [] c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(X,Y),Y).
% 2743 [] -equal(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(v_^f,t_a),v_^f) | -c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(v_^f,t_a).
% 2744 [] equal(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(v_^f,t_a),v_^f) | c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(v_^f,t_a).
% 2748 [hyper:2733,2744] equal(c_^u^n^i^t^y_^ototalize(v_^f,t_a),v_^f).
% 7072 [para:2748.1.1,2734.1.1] c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oall__total(v_^f,t_a).
% 7073 [hyper:2743,7072,demod:2748,cut:1373] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 4
% seconds given: 13
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    1319
%  derived clauses:   8062
%  kept clauses:      2614
%  kept size sum:     24283
%  kept mid-nuclei:   606
%  kept new demods:   26
%  forw unit-subs:    3025
%  forw double-subs: 172
%  forw overdouble-subs: 68
%  backward subs:     14
%  fast unit cutoff:  49
%  full unit cutoff:  7
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  2
%  real runtime  :  0.61
%  process. runtime:  0.58
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           131
%  length fails:    6
%  strength fails:  4
%  predlist fails:  4
%  aux str. fails:  2
%  by-lit fails:    1
%  full subs tried: 113
%  full subs fail:  45
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP24350/COM/COM009-1+eq_r.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------