%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : DCTP---1.31 % Problem : COM011-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : oldtptp % Command : dctp-wrapper -negpref -complexity -fullrewrite -alternate -resisol %s % Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Dec 3 19:39:18 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.00s % Output : Assurance 0.00s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % running dctp on problem file COM011-2.oldtptp on host art04.cs.miami.edu % starting preprocessing loop for 10 clauses % starting preprocessing loop for 10 clauses % no conjecture type clause ... restricting relevance to all-negative clauses % problem statistics for file /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29942/COM011-2.oldtptp % Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 1 non-Horn; 1 unit) % Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equality) % Maximal clause size : 3 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 propositional; 3-3 arity) % Number of functors : 13 ( 4 constant; 0-3 arity) % Number of variables : 29 ( 1 singleton) % Maximal term depth : 4 % Starting proof % **************** Exit status is success (PROOF found in 0.0 seconds) **************** % Proof search statistics: % ======================== % Length initial path: 10 % Linking steps (succ/fail): 36 / 23 % Twin-clause inferences: 15 % Eager eliminations: 0 % Rewrites (subgoal/path): 0 / 0 % GR-closures total/c-foldup: 44 / 0 % Links generated/deleted: 100 / 91 % Links sweeped vector/all: 0(0) / 0(0) % Clauses in tableau/pruned: 51 / 45 % Regularity/Tautology fails: 0 / 0 (0) % Renamings/Contractions: 0 / 0 % Variants deleted/subsumed: 47 / 3 % Clauses by splitting: 0 % Variant subsumption tests: 5 % Fails ful/mat/sig/len: 0 / 2 / 0 / 0 % Pre subsumption tests: 146 % Subsumed unit/path/back: 4 / 0 / 3 % Coupled eliminations: 7 % Simplifications/lemmas: 6 / 3 (0) % Foldups root/context: 4 / 2 % Maximum term depth/compl: 6 / 53 % Relevance vectors: 102 % Unifications/failed: 0 / 0 % Maximum tableau depth: 49 % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------