↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:52:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 00:08:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.54/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.54/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.63  
% 0.54/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.54/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.54/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64  % File     : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.54/0.64  % Domain   : Computing Theory
% 0.54/0.64  % Problem  : Newman's lemma on rewriting systems 01, 00 expansion
% 0.54/0.64  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.54/0.64  % English  :
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  % Refs     : [VLP07] Verchinine et al. (2007), System for Automated Deduction
% 0.54/0.64  %          : [PV+07] Paskevich et al. (2007), Reasoning Inside a Formula an
% 0.54/0.64  %          : [Pas08] Paskevich (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.54/0.64  % Source   : [Pas08]
% 0.54/0.64  % Names    : newman_01.00 [Pas08]
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.54/0.64  % Rating   : 0.11 v8.2.0, 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.5.0, 0.09 v7.4.0, 0.13 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.07 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.13 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.12 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.39 v4.0.0
% 0.54/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   0 unt;   2 def)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   45 (   1 equ)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Number of connectives :   35 (   0   ~;   2   |;  18   &)
% 0.54/0.64  %                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.54/0.64  %            Number of variables   :   21 (  20   !;   1   ?)
% 0.54/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  % Comments : Problem generated by the SAD system [VLP07]
% 0.54/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mElmSort,axiom,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64       => $true ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mRelSort,axiom,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( aRewritingSystem0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64       => $true ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mReduct,axiom,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0,W1] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64          & aRewritingSystem0(W1) )
% 0.54/0.64       => ! [W2] :
% 0.54/0.64            ( aReductOfIn0(W2,W0,W1)
% 0.54/0.64           => aElement0(W2) ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mWFOrd,axiom,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0,W1] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64          & aElement0(W1) )
% 0.54/0.64       => ( iLess0(W0,W1)
% 0.54/0.64         => $true ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mTCbr,axiom,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0,W1,W2] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64          & aRewritingSystem0(W1)
% 0.54/0.64          & aElement0(W2) )
% 0.54/0.64       => ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W2)
% 0.54/0.64         => $true ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mTCDef,definition,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0,W1,W2] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64          & aRewritingSystem0(W1)
% 0.54/0.64          & aElement0(W2) )
% 0.54/0.64       => ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W2)
% 0.54/0.64        <=> ( aReductOfIn0(W2,W0,W1)
% 0.54/0.64            | ? [W3] :
% 0.54/0.64                ( aElement0(W3)
% 0.54/0.64                & aReductOfIn0(W3,W0,W1)
% 0.54/0.64                & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W3,W1,W2) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mTCTrans,axiom,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0,W1,W2,W3] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64          & aRewritingSystem0(W1)
% 0.54/0.64          & aElement0(W2)
% 0.54/0.64          & aElement0(W3) )
% 0.54/0.64       => ( ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W2)
% 0.54/0.64            & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W2,W1,W3) )
% 0.54/0.64         => sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W3) ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(mTCRDef,definition,
% 0.54/0.64      ! [W0,W1,W2] :
% 0.54/0.64        ( ( aElement0(W0)
% 0.54/0.64          & aRewritingSystem0(W1)
% 0.54/0.64          & aElement0(W2) )
% 0.54/0.64       => ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(W0,W1,W2)
% 0.54/0.64        <=> ( W0 = W2
% 0.54/0.64            | sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W2) ) ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(m__349,hypothesis,
% 0.54/0.64      ( aElement0(xx)
% 0.54/0.64      & aRewritingSystem0(xR)
% 0.54/0.64      & aElement0(xy)
% 0.54/0.64      & aElement0(xz) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  fof(m__,conjecture,
% 0.54/0.64      ( ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
% 0.54/0.64        & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy,xR,xz) )
% 0.54/0.64     => sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz) ) ).
% 0.54/0.64  
% 0.54/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.54/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.54/0.64  %ClaNum:34(EqnAxiom:17)
% 0.54/0.64  %VarNum:109(SingletonVarNum:32)
% 0.54/0.64  %MaxLitNum:7
% 0.54/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.54/0.64  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.54/0.64  %goalClause: 22 23 24
% 0.54/0.64  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.54/0.64  [18]P1(a1)
% 0.54/0.64  [19]P1(a4)
% 0.54/0.64  [20]P1(a5)
% 0.54/0.64  [21]P2(a2)
% 0.54/0.64  [22]P4(a1,a2,a4)
% 0.54/0.64  [23]P4(a4,a2,a5)
% 0.54/0.64  [24]~P4(a1,a2,a5)
% 0.54/0.64  [26]~P3(x261,x262,x263)+P1(x261)+~P1(x262)+~P2(x263)
% 0.54/0.64  [25]~E(x251,x253)+~P1(x253)+~P1(x251)+~P2(x252)+P4(x251,x252,x253)
% 0.54/0.64  [27]~P1(x271)+~P1(x273)+~P2(x272)+~P3(x273,x271,x272)+P5(x271,x272,x273)
% 0.54/0.64  [28]~P1(x283)+~P1(x281)+~P2(x282)+~P5(x281,x282,x283)+P4(x281,x282,x283)
% 0.54/0.64  [29]~P1(x292)+~P1(x291)+~P2(x293)+~P4(x291,x293,x292)+E(x291,x292)+P5(x291,x293,x292)
% 0.54/0.64  [32]~P1(x321)+~P1(x322)+~P2(x323)+~P5(x322,x323,x321)+P3(x321,x322,x323)+P1(f3(x322,x323,x321))
% 0.54/0.64  [33]~P1(x331)+~P1(x332)+~P2(x333)+~P5(x332,x333,x331)+P3(x331,x332,x333)+P3(f3(x332,x333,x331),x332,x333)
% 0.54/0.64  [34]~P1(x341)+~P1(x342)+~P2(x343)+~P5(x342,x343,x341)+P3(x341,x342,x343)+P5(f3(x342,x343,x341),x343,x341)
% 0.54/0.64  [30]~P1(x303)+~P1(x301)+~P2(x302)+~P3(x304,x301,x302)+~P5(x304,x302,x303)+P5(x301,x302,x303)+~P1(x304)
% 0.54/0.64  [31]~P1(x313)+~P1(x311)+~P2(x312)+~P5(x314,x312,x313)+~P5(x311,x312,x314)+P5(x311,x312,x313)+~P1(x314)
% 0.54/0.64  %EqnAxiom
% 0.54/0.64  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.54/0.64  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.54/0.64  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.54/0.64  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43,x44),f3(x42,x43,x44))
% 0.54/0.64  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51,x54),f3(x53,x52,x54))
% 0.54/0.64  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x63,x64,x61),f3(x63,x64,x62))
% 0.54/0.64  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.54/0.64  [8]P5(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P5(x81,x83,x84)
% 0.54/0.64  [9]P5(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P5(x93,x91,x94)
% 0.54/0.64  [10]P5(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P5(x103,x104,x101)
% 0.54/0.64  [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.54/0.64  [12]P3(x122,x123,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x121,x123,x124)
% 0.54/0.64  [13]P3(x133,x132,x134)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x131,x134)
% 0.54/0.64  [14]P3(x143,x144,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P3(x143,x144,x141)
% 0.54/0.64  [15]P4(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x151,x153,x154)
% 0.54/0.64  [16]P4(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x161,x164)
% 0.54/0.65  [17]P4(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P4(x173,x174,x171)
% 0.54/0.65  
% 0.54/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (~P1(x351)+~P1(x351)+P4(x351,x352,x351)+~P2(x352)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(equality_inference,[],[25])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(36,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (~E(a4,a1)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[23,24,15])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(38,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (P4(a1,a2,a1)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,23,24,18,21,15,17,35])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (P5(a4,a2,a5)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,23,24,18,19,20,21,15,17,35,29])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(58,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (E(a1,a4)+P5(a1,a2,a4)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,23,24,38,18,20,19,21,17,15,16,25,29])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(88,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (P5(a1,a2,a4)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[36,2,58])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(98,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     (P5(a1,a2,a5)),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[40,88,21,18,20,19,31])).
% 0.54/0.65  cnf(109,plain,
% 0.54/0.65     ($false),
% 0.54/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,21,18,20,98,28]),
% 0.54/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.65  % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------