↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : COM016+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:57:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.98s 3.92s
% Output   : Refutation 8.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  141 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  436 (  45   ~;  55   |;  47   &; 289   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0   ^;   7   !;  10   ?;  19   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(aElement0_decl,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

thf(sdtmndtplgtdt0_decl,type,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(aReductOfIn0_decl,type,
    aReductOfIn0: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sdtmndtasgtdt0_decl,type,
    sdtmndtasgtdt0: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(xa_decl,type,
    xa: $i ).

thf(xR_decl,type,
    xR: $i ).

thf(xb_decl,type,
    xb: $i ).

thf(xc_decl,type,
    xc: $i ).

thf(sk14_decl,type,
    sk14: $i ).

thf(sk15_decl,type,
    sk15: $i ).

thf(sk14_def,definition,
    ( sk14
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk15_def,definition,
    ( sk15
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( xa @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    & ( ? [A: $i] :
          ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xc @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( xb @ ( xR @ ( xa @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    & ( ? [A: $i] :
          ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731_02) ).

thf(103,plain,
    ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( xa @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    & ( ? [A: $i] :
          ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xc @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( xb @ ( xR @ ( xa @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    & ( ? [A: $i] :
          ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          & ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(104,plain,
    ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( xa @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    & ( ( xc @ ( xR @ ( sk15 @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xc @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( xR @ ( xa @ ( sk15 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xc @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( sk15 @ aElement0 )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xc @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( xb @ ( xR @ ( xa @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    & ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( sk14 @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( xR @ ( xa @ ( sk14 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( sk14 @ aElement0 )
      | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[103]) ).

thf(110,plain,
    ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( sk14 @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[104]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtasgtdt0 ) ) )
        | ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
        | ? [B: $i] :
            ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( B @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
            & ( xR @ ( A @ ( B @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
            & ( B @ aElement0 ) )
        | ( xR @ ( A @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ( A = xb ) )
      & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
      & ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtasgtdt0 ) ) )
          | ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          | ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( B @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
              & ( xR @ ( A @ ( B @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
              & ( B @ aElement0 ) )
          | ( xR @ ( A @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          | ( A = xb ) )
        & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        & ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtasgtdt0 ) ) )
          | ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
          | ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( xb @ ( xR @ ( B @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
              & ( xR @ ( A @ ( B @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
              & ( B @ aElement0 ) )
          | ( xR @ ( A @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
          | ( A = xb ) )
        & ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        & ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtasgtdt0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( B @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( xR @ ( A @ ( B @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( B @ aElement0 )
        | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( xR @ ( A @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) )
      & ( ( A != xb )
        | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[22]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != xb )
      | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 )
      | ( A != xb ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ( ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
    | ~ ( xb @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ( ( xc @ aElement0 )
    & ( xb @ aElement0 )
    & ( xa @ aElement0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731) ).

thf(96,plain,
    ( ( xc @ aElement0 )
    & ( xb @ aElement0 )
    & ( xa @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(97,plain,
    ( ( xc @ aElement0 )
    & ( xb @ aElement0 )
    & ( xa @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[96]) ).

thf(99,plain,
    xb @ aElement0,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[97]) ).

thf(178,plain,
    ( ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[30,99]) ).

thf(179,plain,
    ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[178]) ).

thf(108,plain,
    ( ( xR @ ( xa @ ( sk14 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
    | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[104]) ).

thf(325,plain,
    ( ( xR @ ( xa @ ( sk14 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[108,179]) ).

thf(326,plain,
    xR @ ( xa @ ( sk14 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[325]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(346,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xR @ ( xa @ ( sk14 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
       != ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[326,25]) ).

thf(347,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xR @ ( xa @ ( sk14 @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) )
       != ( xR @ ( xa @ ( A @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( A @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[346]) ).

thf(348,plain,
    ( ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( sk14 @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    | ~ ( sk14 @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[347:[bind(A,$thf( sk14 ))]]) ).

thf(107,plain,
    ( ( sk14 @ aElement0 )
    | ( xR @ ( xa @ ( xb @ aReductOfIn0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[104]) ).

thf(242,plain,
    ( ( sk14 @ aElement0 )
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[107,179]) ).

thf(243,plain,
    sk14 @ aElement0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[242]) ).

thf(414,plain,
    ( ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( sk14 @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[348,243]) ).

thf(415,plain,
    ~ ( xb @ ( xR @ ( sk14 @ sdtmndtplgtdt0 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[414]) ).

thf(489,plain,
    ( $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[110,179,415]) ).

thf(490,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[489]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM016+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.17/0.42  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:22:03 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.42  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.43/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (225ms). 
% 1.43/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.16/1.66  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.16/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.41/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.41/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.41/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.41/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.41/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.41/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.62/1.83  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 19 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.83/1.91  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 19 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.83/1.92  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.83/1.94  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.83/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.83/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.83/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.83/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.83/1.97  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.83/1.98  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.83/1.98  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 8.98/3.91  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 8.98/3.91  % Time passed: 3342ms (effective reasoning time: 2651ms)
% 8.98/3.91  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 8.98/3.91  % Axioms used in derivation (2): m__731_02, m__731
% 8.98/3.91  % No. of inferences in proof: 31
% 8.98/3.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3342 ms resp. 2651 ms w/o parsing
% 8.98/3.96  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.98/3.96  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------