↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : COM018+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:59:40 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  17   ~;  15   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mTermNF,axiom,
    ! [W0] :
      ( ( isTerminating0(W0)
        & aRewritingSystem0(W0) )
     => ! [W1] :
          ( aElement0(W1)
         => ? [W2] : aNormalFormOfIn0(W2,W1,W0) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mTermNF) ).

fof(m__656_01,axiom,
    ( isTerminating0(xR)
    & isLocallyConfluent0(xR) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',m__656_01) ).

fof(m__799,axiom,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xv,xR,xw)
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xu,xR,xw)
    & aElement0(xw) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',m__799) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    ? [W0] : aNormalFormOfIn0(W0,xw,xR),
    file('theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(m___neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [W0] : aNormalFormOfIn0(W0,xw,xR),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(m__656,axiom,
    aRewritingSystem0(xR),
    file('theBenchmark.p',m__656) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    aRewritingSystem0(xR),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[m__656]) ).

fof(nnf_14,plain,
    ! [W0] :
      ( ! [W1] :
          ( ? [W2] : aNormalFormOfIn0(W2,W1,W0)
          | ~ aElement0(W1) )
      | ~ isTerminating0(W0)
      | ~ aRewritingSystem0(W0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mTermNF]) ).

fof(sk_mTermNF_sk,plain,
    ! [W0] :
      ( ! [W1] :
          ( aNormalFormOfIn0(sK0(W0,W1),W1,W0)
          | ~ aElement0(W1) )
      | ~ isTerminating0(W0)
      | ~ aRewritingSystem0(W0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(W2,sK0(W0,W1))],[nnf_14]) ).

fof(sk_mTermNF,plain,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( aNormalFormOfIn0(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1,VAR_0)
      | ~ aElement0(VAR_1)
      | ~ isTerminating0(VAR_0)
      | ~ aRewritingSystem0(VAR_0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_mTermNF_sk]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( aNormalFormOfIn0(sK0(A,B),B,A)
    | ~ aElement0(B)
    | ~ isTerminating0(A)
    | ~ aRewritingSystem0(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_mTermNF]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( aNormalFormOfIn0(sK0(xR,A),A,xR)
    | ~ aElement0(A)
    | ~ isTerminating0(xR) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aNormalFormOfIn0(A,xw,xR),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[m___neg]) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    aElement0(xw),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[m__799]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    isTerminating0(xR),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[m__656_01]) ).

cnf(c_145,plain,
    ( aNormalFormOfIn0(sK0(xR,A),A,xR)
    | ~ aElement0(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_387,plain,
    aNormalFormOfIn0(sK0(xR,xw),xw,xR),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_95]) ).

cnf(c_386,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_387]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM018+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:24:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 1705995 was started by sandbox2 on n018,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 23:24:07 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Proof 1 at 0.04 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.10/0.42  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.10/0.42  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.10/0.42  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.10/0.42  % Given clauses 78.
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------