↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : COM021+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:15:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   96 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   25 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   95 (  13   ~;  40   |;  42   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn   2   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__850,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xx)
    & ( xb = xx
      | ( ( aReductOfIn0(xx,xb,xR)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( aElement0(X1)
              & aReductOfIn0(X1,xb,xR)
              & sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xx) ) )
        & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xx) ) )
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,xx)
    & ( xd = xx
      | ( ( aReductOfIn0(xx,xd,xR)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( aElement0(X1)
              & aReductOfIn0(X1,xd,xR)
              & sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xx) ) )
        & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xd,xR,xx) ) )
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xd,xR,xx) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__850) ).

fof(m__818,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xd)
    & ( xw = xd
      | ( ( aReductOfIn0(xd,xw,xR)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( aElement0(X1)
              & aReductOfIn0(X1,xw,xR)
              & sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xd) ) )
        & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xw,xR,xd) ) )
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xw,xR,xd)
    & ~ ? [X1] : aReductOfIn0(X1,xd,xR)
    & aNormalFormOfIn0(xd,xw,xR) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__818) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( xb = xd
    | aReductOfIn0(xd,xb,xR)
    | ? [X1] :
        ( aElement0(X1)
        & aReductOfIn0(X1,xb,xR)
        & sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xd) )
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xd)
    | sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,xd) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xx)
    & ( aElement0(esk27_0)
      | aReductOfIn0(xx,xb,xR)
      | xb = xx )
    & ( aReductOfIn0(esk27_0,xb,xR)
      | aReductOfIn0(xx,xb,xR)
      | xb = xx )
    & ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk27_0,xR,xx)
      | aReductOfIn0(xx,xb,xR)
      | xb = xx )
    & ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xx)
      | xb = xx )
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,xx)
    & ( aElement0(esk28_0)
      | aReductOfIn0(xx,xd,xR)
      | xd = xx )
    & ( aReductOfIn0(esk28_0,xd,xR)
      | aReductOfIn0(xx,xd,xR)
      | xd = xx )
    & ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk28_0,xR,xx)
      | aReductOfIn0(xx,xd,xR)
      | xd = xx )
    & ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(xd,xR,xx)
      | xd = xx )
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xd,xR,xx) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__850])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
    ! [X81] :
      ( aElement0(xd)
      & ( aElement0(esk26_0)
        | aReductOfIn0(xd,xw,xR)
        | xw = xd )
      & ( aReductOfIn0(esk26_0,xw,xR)
        | aReductOfIn0(xd,xw,xR)
        | xw = xd )
      & ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(esk26_0,xR,xd)
        | aReductOfIn0(xd,xw,xR)
        | xw = xd )
      & ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(xw,xR,xd)
        | xw = xd )
      & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xw,xR,xd)
      & ~ aReductOfIn0(X81,xd,xR)
      & aNormalFormOfIn0(xd,xw,xR) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__818])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( xb = xd
      | aReductOfIn0(xd,xb,xR)
      | ? [X1] :
          ( aElement0(X1)
          & aReductOfIn0(X1,xb,xR)
          & sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xd) )
      | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xd)
      | sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,xd) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    ( aReductOfIn0(esk28_0,xd,xR)
    | aReductOfIn0(xx,xd,xR)
    | xd = xx ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ~ aReductOfIn0(X1,xd,xR),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X84] :
      ( xb != xd
      & ~ aReductOfIn0(xd,xb,xR)
      & ( ~ aElement0(X84)
        | ~ aReductOfIn0(X84,xb,xR)
        | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X84,xR,xd) )
      & ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xd)
      & ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,xd) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xx)
    | xb = xx ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    xx = xd,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    xb != xd,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xd),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COM021+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:53:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.40  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.20/0.40  # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.20/0.40  #
% 0.20/0.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------