↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : COM022+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:07:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.87s 2.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (   9 unt;  10 nHn;  35 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   76 (  25 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_374,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xb)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_374) ).

cnf(i_0_370,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xb
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xb) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_370) ).

cnf(i_0_365,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xc
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_365) ).

cnf(i_0_388,plain,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,esk29_0)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_388) ).

cnf(i_0_400,plain,
    ( aElement0(esk29_0)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_400) ).

cnf(i_0_339,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xc,xR,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_339) ).

cnf(i_0_383,plain,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xc,xR,esk29_0)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_383) ).

cnf(i_0_363,negated_conjecture,
    ( xb != X1
    | xc != X1
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_363) ).

cnf(i_0_62,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xb),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(i_0_360,negated_conjecture,
    ( xb != X1
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xc,xR,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_360) ).

cnf(i_0_348,negated_conjecture,
    ( xc != X1
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_348) ).

cnf(i_0_61,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hajat4sr/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(c_0_413,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xb)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xc) ),
    i_0_374 ).

cnf(c_0_414,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xb
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xb) ),
    i_0_370 ).

cnf(c_0_415,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xb
    | epred1_0
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xc) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_413,c_0_414]) ).

cnf(c_0_416,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xc
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xc) ),
    i_0_365 ).

cnf(c_0_417,plain,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,esk29_0)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    i_0_388 ).

cnf(c_0_418,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xc
    | xa = xb
    | epred1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_415,c_0_416]) ).

cnf(c_0_419,plain,
    ( aElement0(esk29_0)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    i_0_400 ).

cnf(c_0_420,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xc,xR,X1) ),
    i_0_339 ).

cnf(c_0_421,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xb
    | xa = xc
    | sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,esk29_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_417,c_0_418]) ).

cnf(c_0_422,plain,
    ( xa = xb
    | xa = xc
    | aElement0(esk29_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_419,c_0_418]) ).

cnf(c_0_423,plain,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xc,xR,esk29_0)
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    i_0_383 ).

cnf(c_0_424,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xc
    | xa = xb
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xc,xR,esk29_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_420,c_0_421]),c_0_422]) ).

cnf(c_0_425,negated_conjecture,
    ( xb != X1
    | xc != X1
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    i_0_363 ).

cnf(c_0_426,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xb),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_427,negated_conjecture,
    ( xb != X1
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xc,xR,X1) ),
    i_0_360 ).

cnf(c_0_428,negated_conjecture,
    ( xa = xb
    | xa = xc ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_423,c_0_418]),c_0_424]) ).

cnf(c_0_429,negated_conjecture,
    xc != xb,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_425]),c_0_426])]) ).

cnf(c_0_430,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xc,xR,xb),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_427]),c_0_426])]) ).

cnf(c_0_431,negated_conjecture,
    ( xc != X1
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,X1) ),
    i_0_348 ).

cnf(c_0_432,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xc),
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_433,negated_conjecture,
    xa = xb,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_414,c_0_428]),c_0_429]),c_0_430]) ).

cnf(c_0_434,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xb,xR,xc),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_431]),c_0_432])]) ).

cnf(c_0_435,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_416,c_0_433]),c_0_433]),c_0_429]),c_0_434]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COM022+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 20:16:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.87/2.38  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.87/2.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.87/2.38  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.87/2.38  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S080N
% 7.87/2.38  # and selection function SelectCQIArNXTEqFirst.
% 7.87/2.38  #
% 7.87/2.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 7.87/2.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.87/2.38  
% 7.87/2.38  # Proof found!
% 7.87/2.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.87/2.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.87/2.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.87/2.38  
% 7.87/2.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.87/2.38  # User time                : 0.041 s
% 7.87/2.38  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.87/2.38  # Total time               : 0.047 s
% 7.87/2.38  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.87/2.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------