%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : COM130+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:07:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.20s 2.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 12 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 21 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_146,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(esk33_0,vsubst(esk34_0,esk35_0,vabs(esk36_0,esk37_0,esk38_0)),esk39_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g9m2ne4b/lgb.p',i_0_146) ).
cnf(i_0_149,negated_conjecture,
esk36_0 = esk34_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g9m2ne4b/lgb.p',i_0_149) ).
cnf(i_0_114,plain,
( X1 = vabs(X2,X3,X4)
| X5 != X6
| X7 != X2
| X8 != X7
| X1 != vsubst(X8,X5,X9)
| X9 != vabs(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g9m2ne4b/lgb.p',i_0_114) ).
cnf(i_0_147,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vbind(esk34_0,esk32_0,esk33_0),vabs(esk36_0,esk37_0,esk38_0),esk39_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g9m2ne4b/lgb.p',i_0_147) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
( X1 != X2
| X3 != X1
| X4 != vabs(X3,X5,X6)
| ~ visFreeVar(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g9m2ne4b/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_145,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| vtcheck(X3,X2,X4)
| ~ vtcheck(vbind(X1,X5,X3),X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g9m2ne4b/lgb.p',i_0_145) ).
cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(esk33_0,vsubst(esk34_0,esk35_0,vabs(esk36_0,esk37_0,esk38_0)),esk39_0),
i_0_146 ).
cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
esk36_0 = esk34_0,
i_0_149 ).
cnf(c_0_158,plain,
( X1 = vabs(X2,X3,X4)
| X5 != X6
| X7 != X2
| X8 != X7
| X1 != vsubst(X8,X5,X9)
| X9 != vabs(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_114 ).
cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vbind(esk34_0,esk32_0,esk33_0),vabs(esk36_0,esk37_0,esk38_0),esk39_0),
i_0_147 ).
cnf(c_0_160,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(esk33_0,vsubst(esk34_0,esk35_0,vabs(esk34_0,esk37_0,esk38_0)),esk39_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_156,c_0_157]) ).
cnf(c_0_161,plain,
vsubst(X1,X2,vabs(X1,X3,X4)) = vabs(X1,X3,X4),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_158])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_162,plain,
( X1 != X2
| X3 != X1
| X4 != vabs(X3,X5,X6)
| ~ visFreeVar(X2,X4) ),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_163,plain,
( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
| vtcheck(X3,X2,X4)
| ~ vtcheck(vbind(X1,X5,X3),X2,X4) ),
i_0_145 ).
cnf(c_0_164,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(vbind(esk34_0,esk32_0,esk33_0),vabs(esk34_0,esk37_0,esk38_0),esk39_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_159,c_0_157]) ).
cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(esk33_0,vabs(esk34_0,esk37_0,esk38_0),esk39_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_160,c_0_161]) ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
~ visFreeVar(X1,vabs(X1,X2,X3)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_162])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_167,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_163,c_0_164]),c_0_165]),c_0_166]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COM130+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 18:43:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.20/2.50 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.20/2.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.20/2.50 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.20/2.50 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S03DN
% 8.20/2.50 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
% 8.20/2.50 #
% 8.20/2.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 8.20/2.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.20/2.50
% 8.20/2.50 # Proof found!
% 8.20/2.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.20/2.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.20/2.50 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.20/2.50
% 8.20/2.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.20/2.50 # User time : 0.013 s
% 8.20/2.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.20/2.50 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 8.20/2.50 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.20/2.50
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------