↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COM130+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:04:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.33s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  64 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  61   ~;  50   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  166 (   0 sgn 150   !;  16   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( X2 = vabs(X3,X0,X5)
        & X1 = X4 )
     => ( ( visFreeVar(X1,X2)
         => ( visFreeVar(X4,X5)
            & X3 != X4 ) )
        & ( ( visFreeVar(X4,X5)
            & X3 != X4 )
         => visFreeVar(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+0.ax',isFreeVar1) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( X4 = vabs(X6,X7,X8)
        & X3 = X0
        & X2 = X1 )
     => ( X1 = X6
       => ( X5 = vsubst(X2,X3,X4)
         => X5 = vabs(X6,X7,X8) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+0.ax',subst3) ).

fof(f56,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),X3,X4)
        & ~ visFreeVar(X0,X3) )
     => vtcheck(X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-Strong') ).

fof(f59,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( vtcheck(vbind(X2,X0,X1),vabs(X4,X5,X6),X7)
        & vtcheck(X1,X3,X0)
        & X2 = X4 )
     => vtcheck(X1,vsubst(X2,X3,vabs(X4,X5,X6)),X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-subst-abs-1') ).

fof(f60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
        ( ( vtcheck(vbind(X2,X0,X1),vabs(X4,X5,X6),X7)
          & vtcheck(X1,X3,X0)
          & X2 = X4 )
       => vtcheck(X1,vsubst(X2,X3,vabs(X4,X5,X6)),X7) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f59]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( vtcheck(vbind(X2,X0,X1),vabs(X4,X5,X6),X7)
      & vtcheck(X1,X3,X0)
      & X2 = X4
      & ~ vtcheck(X1,vsubst(X2,X3,vabs(X4,X5,X6)),X7) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( vtcheck(vbind(X2,X0,X1),vabs(X4,X5,X6),X7)
      & vtcheck(X1,X3,X0)
      & X2 = X4
      & ~ vtcheck(X1,vsubst(X2,X3,vabs(X4,X5,X6)),X7) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),X3,X4)
      | visFreeVar(X0,X3)
      | vtcheck(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),X3,X4)
      | visFreeVar(X0,X3)
      | vtcheck(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | X0 != X3
      | X1 != X2
      | X1 != X6
      | vsubst(X2,X3,X4) != X5
      | X5 = vabs(X6,X7,X8) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | X0 != X3
      | X1 != X2
      | X1 != X6
      | vsubst(X2,X3,X4) != X5
      | X5 = vabs(X6,X7,X8) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( vabs(X3,X0,X5) != X2
      | X1 != X4
      | ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X1,X2)
          | ( visFreeVar(X4,X5)
            & X3 != X4 ) )
        & ( ~ visFreeVar(X4,X5)
          | X3 = X4
          | visFreeVar(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( vabs(X3,X0,X5) != X2
      | X1 != X4
      | ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X1,X2)
          | ( visFreeVar(X4,X5)
            & X3 != X4 ) )
        & ( ~ visFreeVar(X4,X5)
          | X3 = X4
          | visFreeVar(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( vtcheck(vbind(sK2,sK0,sK1),vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6),sK7)
    & vtcheck(sK1,sK3,sK0)
    & sK2 = sK4
    & ~ vtcheck(sK1,vsubst(sK2,sK3,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6)),sK7) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4),skolemize(X5,sK5),skolemize(X6,sK6),skolemize(X7,sK7)],[f62]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    vtcheck(vbind(sK2,sK0,sK1),vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6),sK7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    sK2 = sK4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ~ vtcheck(sK1,vsubst(sK2,sK3,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6)),sK7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),X3,X4)
      | visFreeVar(X0,X3)
      | vtcheck(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X8,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | X0 != X3
      | X1 != X2
      | X1 != X6
      | vsubst(X2,X3,X4) != X5
      | vabs(X6,X7,X8) = X5 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( vabs(X3,X0,X5) != X2
      | X1 != X4
      | ~ visFreeVar(X1,X2)
      | X3 != X4 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ~ vtcheck(sK1,vsubst(sK4,sK3,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6)),sK7),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f98,f97]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    vtcheck(vbind(sK4,sK0,sK1),vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6),sK7),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f95,f97]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X8,X6,X7,X4] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | X0 != X3
      | X1 != X2
      | X1 != X6
      | vsubst(X2,X3,X4) = vabs(X6,X7,X8) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f114]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X8,X6,X7,X4] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | X0 != X3
      | X2 != X6
      | vsubst(X2,X3,X4) = vabs(X6,X7,X8) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f145]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X8,X6,X7,X4] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | X0 != X3
      | vabs(X6,X7,X8) = vsubst(X6,X3,X4) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f146]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ! [X3,X8,X6,X7,X4] :
      ( vabs(X6,X7,X8) != X4
      | vabs(X6,X7,X8) = vsubst(X6,X3,X4) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f147]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ! [X3,X8,X6,X7] : vabs(X6,X7,X8) = vsubst(X6,X3,vabs(X6,X7,X8)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( vabs(X4,X0,X5) != X2
      | X1 != X4
      | ~ visFreeVar(X1,X2) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f130]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X4,X5] :
      ( vabs(X4,X0,X5) != X2
      | ~ visFreeVar(X4,X2) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f179]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0,X4,X5] : ~ visFreeVar(X4,vabs(X4,X0,X5)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f180]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ vtcheck(sK1,vsubst(sK4,sK3,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6)),sK7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    vtcheck(vbind(sK4,sK0,sK1),vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6),sK7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f133]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( visFreeVar(X0,X3)
      | vtcheck(X2,X3,X4)
      | ~ vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),X3,X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : vsubst(X0,X1,vabs(X0,X2,X3)) = vabs(X0,X2,X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f149]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ~ visFreeVar(X0,vabs(X0,X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).

tcf(c_256,plain,
    ~ vtcheck(sK1,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6),sK7),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_756,plain,
    ( visFreeVar(sK4,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6))
    | vtcheck(sK1,vabs(sK4,sK5,sK6),sK7) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_758,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_756,c_79,c_256]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM130+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:54:55 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 3.33/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.33/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.33/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.33/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % 
% 3.33/1.28  % clauses                               32
% 3.33/1.28  % conjectures                           2
% 3.33/1.28  % EPR                                   1
% 3.33/1.28  % Horn                                  25
% 3.33/1.28  % unary                                 11
% 3.33/1.28  % binary                                15
% 3.33/1.28  % lits                                  59
% 3.33/1.28  % lits eq                               31
% 3.33/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.33/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.33/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.33/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        14
% 3.33/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ 
% 3.33/1.28  % Current options:
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.33/1.28  % 
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.33/1.28  
% 3.33/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------