%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : COM140+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:04:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.32s 11.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 79 ( 25 unt; 3 def)
% Number of atoms : 225 ( 71 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 216 ( 87 ~; 90 |; 26 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 220 ( 0 sgn 208 !; 12 ?; 66 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( X1 = vvar(X2)
& X0 = X3 )
=> ( ( visFreeVar(X0,X1)
=> X2 = X3 )
& ( X2 = X3
=> visFreeVar(X0,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+0.ax',isFreeVar0) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( X1 = vapp(X2,X4)
& X0 = X3 )
=> ( ( visFreeVar(X0,X1)
=> ( visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X3,X2) ) )
& ( ( visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X3,X2) )
=> visFreeVar(X0,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+0.ax',isFreeVar2) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( vgensym(X1) = X0
=> ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+0.ax','gensym-is-fresh') ).
fof(f56,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( valphaEquivalent(X1,X0)
=> valphaEquivalent(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+1.ax','alpha-equiv-sym') ).
fof(f58,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ visFreeVar(X2,X3)
=> valphaEquivalent(vabs(X1,X0,X3),vabs(X2,X0,vsubst(X1,vvar(X2),X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+1.ax','alpha-equiv-subst-abs') ).
fof(f59,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( valphaEquivalent(X0,X2)
& vtcheck(X1,X0,X3) )
=> vtcheck(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+1.ax','alpha-equiv-typing') ).
fof(f61,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6)
& vlookup(X0,X2) = vnoType
& X0 != X3 )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-Weak-abs-1-gen') ).
fof(f62,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5)
& vlookup(X0,X2) = vnoType
& X0 = X3 )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-Weak-abs-2') ).
fof(f63,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5)
& vlookup(X0,X2) = vnoType
& X0 = X3 )
=> vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f62]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( vvar(X2) != X1
| X0 != X3
| ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1)
| X2 = X3 )
& ( X2 != X3
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f80,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( vvar(X2) != X1
| X0 != X3
| ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1)
| X2 = X3 )
& ( X2 != X3
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f79]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( vapp(X2,X4) != X1
| X0 != X3
| ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1)
| visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X3,X2) )
& ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4)
& ~ visFreeVar(X3,X2) )
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( vapp(X2,X4) != X1
| X0 != X3
| ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1)
| visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X3,X2) )
& ( ( ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4)
& ~ visFreeVar(X3,X2) )
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f104,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( vgensym(X1) != X0
| ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f148,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ valphaEquivalent(X1,X0)
| valphaEquivalent(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f151,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( visFreeVar(X2,X3)
| valphaEquivalent(vabs(X1,X0,X3),vabs(X2,X0,vsubst(X1,vvar(X2),X3))) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).
fof(f152,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ valphaEquivalent(X0,X2)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X0,X3)
| vtcheck(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).
fof(f153,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ valphaEquivalent(X0,X2)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X0,X3)
| vtcheck(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f152]) ).
fof(f156,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6)
| vnoType != vlookup(X0,X2)
| X0 = X3
| vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f157,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6)
| vnoType != vlookup(X0,X2)
| X0 = X3
| vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f156]) ).
fof(f158,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5)
& vlookup(X0,X2) = vnoType
& X0 = X3
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f159,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5)
& vlookup(X0,X2) = vnoType
& X0 = X3
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,veabs),X5) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f158]) ).
fof(f222,plain,
( vtcheck(sK89,vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92)
& vnoType = vlookup(sK87,sK89)
& sK87 = sK90
& ~ vtcheck(vbind(sK87,sK88,sK89),vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK87,sK88,sK89,sK90,sK91,sK92]),skolemize(X0,sK87),skolemize(X1,sK88),skolemize(X2,sK89),skolemize(X3,sK90),skolemize(X4,sK91),skolemize(X5,sK92)],[f159]) ).
fof(f239,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( vvar(X2) != X1
| X0 != X3
| X2 != X3
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).
fof(f244,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( vapp(X2,X4) != X1
| X0 != X3
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f245,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( vapp(X2,X4) != X1
| X0 != X3
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X2)
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f275,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( vgensym(X1) != X0
| ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).
fof(f372,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ valphaEquivalent(X1,X0)
| valphaEquivalent(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).
fof(f374,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( visFreeVar(X2,X3)
| valphaEquivalent(vabs(X1,X0,X3),vabs(X2,X0,vsubst(X1,vvar(X2),X3))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
fof(f375,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ valphaEquivalent(X0,X2)
| ~ vtcheck(X1,X0,X3)
| vtcheck(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f153]) ).
fof(f377,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X6,X4,X5] :
( ~ vtcheck(X2,vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6)
| vnoType != vlookup(X0,X2)
| X0 = X3
| vtcheck(vbind(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X4,X5),X6) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).
fof(f378,plain,
vtcheck(sK89,vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f379,plain,
vnoType = vlookup(sK87,sK89),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f380,plain,
sK87 = sK90,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f381,plain,
~ vtcheck(vbind(sK87,sK88,sK89),vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).
fof(f382,plain,
~ vtcheck(vbind(sK90,sK88,sK89),vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f381,f380]) ).
fof(f383,plain,
vnoType = vlookup(sK90,sK89),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f379,f380]) ).
fof(f393,plain,
! [X3,X0,X1] :
( vvar(X3) != X1
| X0 != X3
| visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f239]) ).
fof(f394,plain,
! [X3,X1] :
( vvar(X3) != X1
| visFreeVar(X3,X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f393]) ).
fof(f395,plain,
! [X3] : visFreeVar(X3,vvar(X3)),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f394]) ).
fof(f405,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1,X4] :
( vapp(X2,X4) != X1
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X2)
| visFreeVar(X3,X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f245]) ).
fof(f406,plain,
! [X2,X3,X4] :
( ~ visFreeVar(X3,X2)
| visFreeVar(X3,vapp(X2,X4)) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f405]) ).
fof(f407,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1,X4] :
( vapp(X2,X4) != X1
| ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X3,X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f244]) ).
fof(f408,plain,
! [X2,X3,X4] :
( ~ visFreeVar(X3,X4)
| visFreeVar(X3,vapp(X2,X4)) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f407]) ).
fof(f433,plain,
! [X1] : ~ visFreeVar(vgensym(X1),X1),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f275]) ).
tcf(c_61,plain,
! [X0: $i] : visFreeVar(X0,vvar(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f395]) ).
tcf(c_66,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,vapp(X1,X2))
| ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f406]) ).
tcf(c_67,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,vapp(X2,X1))
| ~ visFreeVar(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f408]) ).
tcf(c_94,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ visFreeVar(vgensym(X0),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f433]) ).
tcf(c_188,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( valphaEquivalent(X1,X0)
| ~ valphaEquivalent(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f372]) ).
tcf(c_190,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X3,X2)
| valphaEquivalent(vabs(X0,X1,X2),vabs(X3,X1,vsubst(X0,vvar(X3),X2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f374]) ).
tcf(c_191,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( vtcheck(X0,X3,X2)
| ~ valphaEquivalent(X1,X3)
| ~ vtcheck(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f375]) ).
tcf(c_193,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
( vtcheck(vbind(X0,X6,X1),vabs(X2,X3,X4),X5)
| ( X0 = X2 )
| ~ vtcheck(X1,vabs(X2,X3,X4),X5)
| ( vlookup(X0,X1) != vnoType ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f377]) ).
tcf(c_194,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(vbind(sK90,sK88,sK89),vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f382]) ).
tcf(c_195,negated_conjecture,
vlookup(sK90,sK89) = vnoType,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f383]) ).
tcf(c_196,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(sK89,vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),sK92),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f378]) ).
tcf(c_13296,definition,
iPr_def_10 = vabs(sK90,sK91,veabs),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_13297,definition,
iPr_def_11 = vlookup(sK90,sK89),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_13298,definition,
iPr_def_12 = vbind(sK90,sK88,sK89),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_13299,negated_conjecture,
vtcheck(sK89,iPr_def_10,sK92),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_13296]) ).
tcf(c_13300,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_11 = vnoType,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_13297]) ).
tcf(c_13301,negated_conjecture,
~ vtcheck(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10,sK92),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_13298]) ).
tcf(c_16477,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ visFreeVar(vgensym(vapp(X0,X1)),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_94]) ).
tcf(c_16485,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ visFreeVar(vgensym(vapp(X0,X1)),X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_94]) ).
tcf(c_16509,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ~ visFreeVar(vgensym(vapp(X0,vapp(X1,X2))),X2),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_16485]) ).
tcf(c_16721,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( vtcheck(sK89,X0,sK92)
| ~ valphaEquivalent(iPr_def_10,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_13299,c_191]) ).
tcf(c_17270,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,veabs)
| valphaEquivalent(iPr_def_10,vabs(X0,sK91,vsubst(sK90,vvar(X0),veabs))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_13296,c_190]) ).
tcf(c_17985,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,veabs)
| valphaEquivalent(vabs(X0,sK91,vsubst(sK90,vvar(X0),veabs)),iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_17270,c_188]) ).
tcf(c_24655,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
( vtcheck(vbind(X0,X6,X1),vabs(X2,X3,X4),X5)
| ( X0 = X2 )
| ~ vtcheck(X1,vabs(X2,X3,X4),X5)
| ( vlookup(X0,X1) != iPr_def_11 ) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_13300]) ).
tcf(c_24671,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( vtcheck(vbind(sK90,X4,sK89),vabs(X0,X1,X2),X3)
| ( X0 = sK90 )
| ~ vtcheck(sK89,vabs(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_13297,c_24655]) ).
tcf(c_24881,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( vtcheck(vbind(sK90,X5,sK89),X4,X3)
| ( X0 = sK90 )
| ~ valphaEquivalent(vabs(X0,X1,X2),X4)
| ~ vtcheck(sK89,vabs(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_24671,c_191]) ).
tcf(c_26257,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( vtcheck(vbind(sK90,X4,sK89),X3,sK92)
| ( X0 = sK90 )
| ~ valphaEquivalent(iPr_def_10,vabs(X0,X1,X2))
| ~ valphaEquivalent(vabs(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_16721,c_24881]) ).
tcf(c_26311,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,veabs)
| vtcheck(vbind(sK90,X1,sK89),iPr_def_10,sK92)
| ( X0 = sK90 )
| ~ valphaEquivalent(iPr_def_10,vabs(X0,sK91,vsubst(sK90,vvar(X0),veabs))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_17985,c_26257]) ).
tcf(c_26377,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,veabs)
| vtcheck(vbind(sK90,X1,sK89),iPr_def_10,sK92)
| ( X0 = sK90 ) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_26311,c_17270,c_26311]) ).
tcf(c_26386,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,veabs)
| vtcheck(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10,sK92)
| ( X0 = sK90 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_13298,c_26377]) ).
tcf(c_26433,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( visFreeVar(X0,veabs)
| ( X0 = sK90 ) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26386,c_13301]) ).
tcf(c_26450,plain,
! [X0: $i] : vgensym(vapp(veabs,X0)) = sK90,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_26433,c_16477]) ).
tcf(c_27457,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ visFreeVar(sK90,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_26450,c_16509]) ).
tcf(c_27996,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_27457]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COM140+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.38 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:54:50 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/10.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/10.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.43
% 0.14/10.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/10.43
% 0.14/10.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/10.44 % Proving...
% 4.32/11.76 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.32/11.76 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.32/11.76 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.32/11.76 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Parsing...
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Proving...
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 %
% 4.32/11.76 % clauses 147
% 4.32/11.76 % conjectures 3
% 4.32/11.76 % EPR 11
% 4.32/11.76 % Horn 119
% 4.32/11.76 % unary 30
% 4.32/11.76 % binary 88
% 4.32/11.76 % lits 317
% 4.32/11.76 % lits eq 138
% 4.32/11.76 % fd_pure 0
% 4.32/11.76 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.32/11.76 % fd_cond 3
% 4.32/11.76 % fd_pseudo_cond 21
% 4.32/11.76 % AC symbols 0
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------
% 4.32/11.76 % Current options:
% 4.32/11.76 % ------
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 %
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % ------ Proving...
% 4.32/11.76 %
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.32/11.76
% 4.32/11.76
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------