↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : COM144+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 24 10:55:05 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 90.50s 11.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 90.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : COM144+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 20 06:19:34 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.19/0.48  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 90.50/11.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 90.50/11.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 90.50/11.68  fof('T-Preservation-T-abs', plain, ![Vx,VS,VC,Veout,VT]:((vreduce(vabs(Vx,VS,ve1))=vsomeExp(Veout)&vtcheck(VC,vabs(Vx,VS,ve1),VT))=>vtcheck(VC,Veout,VT)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'T-Preservation-T-abs')).
% 90.50/11.68  fof('T-Preservation-T-abs'_negated, plain, ~(![Vx,VS,VC,Veout,VT]:((vreduce(vabs(Vx,VS,ve1))=vsomeExp(Veout)&vtcheck(VC,vabs(Vx,VS,ve1),VT))=>vtcheck(VC,Veout,VT))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], ['T-Preservation-T-abs'])).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(149, plain, vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1)) = vsomeExp(sK78), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], ['T-Preservation-T-abs'_negated])).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(l0, plain, vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1)) = vsomeExp(sK78), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [149])).
% 90.50/11.68  fof(reduce1, plain, ![Vx,VS,Ve,VExp0,RESULT]:(VExp0=vabs(Vx,VS,Ve)=>(RESULT=vreduce(VExp0)=>RESULT=vnoExp)), file('Axioms/COM001+0.ax', reduce1)).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(96, plain, X0 != vabs(X1,X2,X3) | X4 != vreduce(X0) | X4 = vnoExp, inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [reduce1])).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(l2, plain, vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1) != vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1) | vsomeExp(sK78) != vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1)) | vsomeExp(sK78) = vnoExp, inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [96])).
% 90.50/11.68  fof(isSomeExp0, plain, ![VOptExp0]:(VOptExp0=vnoExp=>~visSomeExp(VOptExp0)), file('Axioms/COM001+0.ax', isSomeExp0)).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(92, plain, X0 != vnoExp | ~visSomeExp(X0), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [isSomeExp0])).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(l3, plain, vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1)) != vnoExp | ~visSomeExp(vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [92])).
% 90.50/11.68  fof(isSomeExp1, plain, ![Ve,VOptExp0]:(VOptExp0=vsomeExp(Ve)=>visSomeExp(VOptExp0)), file('Axioms/COM001+0.ax', isSomeExp1)).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(93, plain, X0 != vsomeExp(X1) | visSomeExp(X0), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [isSomeExp1])).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(l9, plain, vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1)) != vsomeExp(sK78) | visSomeExp(vreduce(vabs(sK75,sK76,ve1))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [93])).
% 90.50/11.68  cnf(final, plain, $false, inference(ground_refutation, [status(thm)], [l0, l2, l3, l9])).
% 90.50/11.68  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------