↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : COM146+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:58:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 15.57s 2.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM146+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:38:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.57/2.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 15.57/2.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 15.57/2.68  fof(isSomeExp0, axiom, ! [X0] : ((X0 = vnoExp => ~visSomeExp(X0)))).
% 15.57/2.68  fof(isSomeExp1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((X1 = vsomeExp(X0) => visSomeExp(X1)))).
% 15.57/2.68  fof(reduce0, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((X1 = vvar(X0) => (X2 = vreduce(X1) => X2 = vnoExp)))).
% 15.57/2.68  fof(T-Preservation-T-var, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((vreduce(vvar(X0)) = vsomeExp(X2) & vtcheck(X1,vvar(X0),X3)) => vtcheck(X1,X2,X3)))).
% 15.57/2.68  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((vreduce(vvar(X0)) = vsomeExp(X2) & vtcheck(X1,vvar(X0),X3)) => vtcheck(X1,X2,X3))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [T-Preservation-T-var])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(c99, plain, X0 != vnoExp | ~visSomeExp(X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [isSomeExp0])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(c100, plain, X0 != vsomeExp(X1) | visSomeExp(X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [isSomeExp1])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(c102, plain, X0 != vvar(X1) | X2 != vreduce(X0) | X2 = vnoExp, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [reduce0])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(c151, plain, vreduce(vvar(sK342)) = vsomeExp(sK344), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d0, plain, visSomeExp(vsomeExp(X0)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c100])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d1, plain, X0 != vsomeExp(sK344) | vvar(sK342) != vvar(X1) | X0 = vnoExp, inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [c151,c102])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d2, plain, X0 = vnoExp | X0 != vsomeExp(sK344), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d1])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d3, plain, vsomeExp(sK344) = vnoExp, inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d2])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d4, plain, visSomeExp(vnoExp), inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d3,d0])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d5, plain, ~visSomeExp(vnoExp), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c99])).
% 15.57/2.68  cnf(d6, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d5,d4])).
% 15.57/2.68  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------