↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : COM147+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:14:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 30.55s 30.87s
% Output   : Proof 30.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : COM147+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 15:21:42 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 30.55/30.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 30.55/30.87  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 30.55/30.87  fof(isValue0, axiom,
% 30.55/30.87      ! [ Vx,VS,Ve,VExp0 ] : ( VExp0 = vabs(Vx, VS, Ve) => visValue(VExp0) ),
% 30.55/30.87      file('COM001+0.ax', isValue0) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(T-Progress-T-abs, conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ! [ VTin,Vx,VS ] : ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(Vx, VS, ve1), VTin) & ~( visValue(vabs(Vx, VS, ve1)) ) ) => ? [ Veout ] : vreduce(vabs(Vx, VS, ve1)) = vsomeExp(Veout) ),
% 30.55/30.87      file('theBenchmark.p', T-Progress-T-abs) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_7_1, plain,
% 30.55/30.87      ! [ Vx,VS,Ve,VExp0 ] : ( ~( VExp0 = vabs(Vx, VS, Ve) ) | visValue(VExp0) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isValue0]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_7_2, plain,
% 30.55/30.87      ! [ U_51,U_50,U_49,U_48 ] : ( ~( U_48 = vabs(U_51, U_50, U_49) ) | visValue(U_48) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_7_1]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_7_3, plain,
% 30.55/30.87      ( ( ! [U_49, U_48, U_51, U_50] : ( U_48 != vabs(U_51, U_50, U_49) | visValue(U_48) ) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_7_2]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(f_7_4, plain,
% 30.55/30.87      ( U_48 != vabs(U_51, U_50, U_49) | visValue(U_48) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_7_3]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_1, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ~( ! [ VTin,Vx,VS ] : ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(Vx, VS, ve1), VTin) & ~( visValue(vabs(Vx, VS, ve1)) ) ) => ? [ Veout ] : vreduce(vabs(Vx, VS, ve1)) = vsomeExp(Veout) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(negate,[status(cth)],[T-Progress-T-abs]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_2, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ? [ VTin,Vx,VS ] : ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(Vx, VS, ve1), VTin) & ~( visValue(vabs(Vx, VS, ve1)) ) ) & ! [ Veout ] : ~( vreduce(vabs(Vx, VS, ve1)) = vsomeExp(Veout) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_58_1]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_3, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ? [ U_374,U_373,U_372 ] : ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(U_373, U_372, ve1), U_374) & ~( visValue(vabs(U_373, U_372, ve1)) ) ) & ! [ U_371 ] : ~( vreduce(vabs(U_373, U_372, ve1)) = vsomeExp(U_371) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_58_2]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_4, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ? [ U_373,U_372 ] : ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(U_373, U_372, ve1), sK76) & ~( visValue(vabs(U_373, U_372, ve1)) ) ) & ! [ U_371 ] : ~( vreduce(vabs(U_373, U_372, ve1)) = vsomeExp(U_371) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK76]),skolemize(U_374,sK76)],[f_58_3]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_5, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ? [ U_372 ] : ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(sK77, U_372, ve1), sK76) & ~( visValue(vabs(sK77, U_372, ve1)) ) ) & ! [ U_371 ] : ~( vreduce(vabs(sK77, U_372, ve1)) = vsomeExp(U_371) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK77]),skolemize(U_373,sK77)],[f_58_4]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_6, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1), sK76) & ~( visValue(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) ) ) & ! [ U_371 ] : ~( vreduce(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) = vsomeExp(U_371) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK78]),skolemize(U_372,sK78)],[f_58_5]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  fof(f_58_7, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ( ( ( vtcheck(vempty, vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1), sK76) ) ) & ( ( ~visValue(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) ) ) & ( ! [U_371] : ( vreduce(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) != vsomeExp(U_371) ) ) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_58_6]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(f_58_9, negated_conjecture,
% 30.55/30.87      ( ~visValue(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_58_7]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(equality_1, axiom,
% 30.55/30.87      ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0 ),
% 30.55/30.87      theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(t1, plain,            ( ~visValue(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(start, [status(thm), parent(0:0)], [f_58_9])  ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(t2, plain,            ( visValue(vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1)) | vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1) != vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(extension, [status(thm), parent(t1:1)], [f_7_4])  ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(t3, plain,            $false,
% 30.55/30.87      inference(connection, [status(thm), parent(t2:1)], [t2:1,t1:1])  ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(t4, plain,            ( vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1) = vabs(sK77, sK78, ve1) ),
% 30.55/30.87      inference(extension, [status(thm), parent(t2:2)], [equality_1])  ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  cnf(t5, plain,            $false,
% 30.55/30.87      inference(connection, [status(thm), parent(t4:1)], [t4:1,t2:2])  ).
% 30.55/30.87  
% 30.55/30.87  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------