%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : COM147+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 10:03:43 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 17 ~; 3 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 6 sgn 25 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
( equal(X2,vabs(X1,X3,X4))
=> visValue(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpXX6Axd/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',isValue0) ).
fof(39,conjecture,
! [X29,X1,X3] :
( ( vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X3,ve1),X29)
& ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)) )
=> ? [X30] : equal(vreduce(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)),vsomeExp(X30)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpXX6Axd/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','T-Progress-T-abs') ).
fof(42,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X29,X1,X3] :
( ( vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X3,ve1),X29)
& ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)) )
=> ? [X30] : equal(vreduce(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)),vsomeExp(X30)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[39]) ).
fof(51,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X29,X1,X3] :
( ( vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X3,ve1),X29)
& ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)) )
=> ? [X30] : equal(vreduce(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)),vsomeExp(X30)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[42,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(56,plain,
! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
( ~ equal(X2,vabs(X1,X3,X4))
| visValue(X2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(57,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ~ equal(X8,vabs(X5,X6,X7))
| visValue(X8) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[56]) ).
cnf(58,plain,
( visValue(X1)
| X1 != vabs(X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
fof(233,negated_conjecture,
? [X29,X1,X3] :
( vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X3,ve1),X29)
& ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X3,ve1))
& ! [X30] : ~ equal(vreduce(vabs(X1,X3,ve1)),vsomeExp(X30)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
fof(234,negated_conjecture,
? [X31,X32,X33] :
( vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X32,X33,ve1),X31)
& ~ visValue(vabs(X32,X33,ve1))
& ! [X34] : ~ equal(vreduce(vabs(X32,X33,ve1)),vsomeExp(X34)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[233]) ).
fof(235,negated_conjecture,
( vtcheck(vempty,vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1),esk13_0)
& ~ visValue(vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1))
& ! [X34] : ~ equal(vreduce(vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1)),vsomeExp(X34)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[234]) ).
fof(236,negated_conjecture,
! [X34] :
( ~ equal(vreduce(vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1)),vsomeExp(X34))
& vtcheck(vempty,vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1),esk13_0)
& ~ visValue(vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[235]) ).
cnf(237,negated_conjecture,
~ visValue(vabs(esk14_0,esk15_0,ve1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[236]) ).
cnf(252,plain,
visValue(vabs(X1,X2,X3)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[58,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(604,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[237,252,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(605,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[604,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(606,negated_conjecture,
$false,
605,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COM147+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.22 % Computer : n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.22 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.02/0.22 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.22 % DateTime : Fri Mar 25 12:26:14 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.22 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.29 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.29 --creating new selector for [COM001+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.38 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpXX6Axd/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.38 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpXX6Axd/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.38 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.38 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.38 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.38 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.38 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.38 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------