↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COM147+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:04:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.84s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  13   ~;   2   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  27   !;   8   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = vabs(X0,X1,X2)
     => visValue(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COM001+0.ax',isValue0) ).

fof(f58,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X2,ve1))
        & vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X2,ve1),X0) )
     => ? [X3] : vreduce(vabs(X1,X2,ve1)) = vsomeExp(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','T-Progress-T-abs') ).

fof(f59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X2,ve1))
          & vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X2,ve1),X0) )
       => ? [X3] : vreduce(vabs(X1,X2,ve1)) = vsomeExp(X3) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f58]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( vabs(X0,X1,X2) != X3
      | visValue(X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X2,ve1))
      & vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X2,ve1),X0)
      & ! [X3] : vreduce(vabs(X1,X2,ve1)) != vsomeExp(X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ visValue(vabs(X1,X2,ve1))
      & vtcheck(vempty,vabs(X1,X2,ve1),X0)
      & ! [X3] : vreduce(vabs(X1,X2,ve1)) != vsomeExp(X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f150]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    ( ~ visValue(vabs(sK89,sK90,ve1))
    & vtcheck(vempty,vabs(sK89,sK90,ve1),sK88)
    & ! [X3] : vsomeExp(X3) != vreduce(vabs(sK89,sK90,ve1)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK88,sK89,sK90]),skolemize(X0,sK88),skolemize(X1,sK89),skolemize(X2,sK90)],[f151]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( vabs(X0,X1,X2) != X3
      | visValue(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f367,plain,
    ~ visValue(vabs(sK89,sK90,ve1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f215]) ).

fof(f376,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : visValue(vabs(X0,X1,X2)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f228]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : visValue(vabs(X0,X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f376]) ).

tcf(c_192,negated_conjecture,
    ~ visValue(vabs(sK89,sK90,ve1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f367]) ).

tcf(c_337,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_192,c_58]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : COM147+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:57:10 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.84/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.84/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.84/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.84/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.84/1.27  
% 1.84/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------