↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COM212_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:04:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.30s 1.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  13   ~;  12   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   20 (  20 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   5 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   44 (  44 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   9   !;   3   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    vNat: vTy ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    visValue: vTerm > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    visNV: vTerm > $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    visSomeTerm: vOptTerm > $o ).

tff(pred_def_4,type,
    vptchecksimple: ( vTy * vTerm ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_5,type,
    sP0: ( vTerm * ( vTerm * vTerm ) ) > $o ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    vTrue: vTerm ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    vFalse: vTerm ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    vnoTerm: vOptTerm ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    vPlus: ( vTerm * vTerm ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    vB: vTy ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    vIfelse: ( vTerm * ( vTerm * vTerm ) ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_12,type,
    vreduce: vTerm > vOptTerm ).

tff(func_def_13,type,
    vplusop: ( vTerm * vTerm ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_14,type,
    vgetTerm: vOptTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_15,type,
    sK1: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_16,type,
    sK2: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_17,type,
    sK3: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_18,type,
    sK4: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_19,type,
    sK5: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_20,type,
    sK6: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_21,type,
    sK7: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_22,type,
    sK8: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_23,type,
    sK9: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_24,type,
    sK10: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_25,type,
    sK11: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_26,type,
    sK12: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_27,type,
    sK13: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_28,type,
    sK14: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_29,type,
    sK15: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_30,type,
    sK16: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_31,type,
    sK17: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_32,type,
    sK18: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_33,type,
    sK19: ( vTerm * ( vTerm * vTerm ) ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_34,type,
    sK20: ( vTerm * ( vTerm * vTerm ) ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_35,type,
    sK21: ( vTerm * ( vTerm * vTerm ) ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_36,type,
    sK22: ( vTerm * ( vTerm * vTerm ) ) > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_37,type,
    sK23: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_38,type,
    sK24: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_39,type,
    sK25: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_40,type,
    sK26: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_41,type,
    sK27: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_42,type,
    sK28: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_43,type,
    sK29: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_44,type,
    sK30: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_45,type,
    sK31: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_46,type,
    sK32: vTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_47,type,
    sK33: vOptTerm > vTerm ).

tff(func_def_48,type,
    sK34: vOptTerm > vTerm ).

tff(f15,axiom,
    vFalse != vZero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','DIFF-False-Zero') ).

tff(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0: vTerm] : ( vFalse != vSucc(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','DIFF-False-Succ') ).

tff(f44,axiom,
    ! [X0: vTerm] :
      ( visNV(X0)
     => ( ? [X1: vTerm] :
            ( visNV(X1)
            & ( X0 = vSucc(X1) ) )
        | ( X0 = vZero ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','isNV-true-INV') ).

tff(f105,conjecture,
    ( visNV(vFalse)
   => vptchecksimple(vFalse,vNat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','isNVisNat-False') ).

tff(f106,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( visNV(vFalse)
     => vptchecksimple(vFalse,vNat) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f105]) ).

tff(f109,plain,
    ( visNV(vFalse)
    & ~ vptchecksimple(vFalse,vNat) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

tff(f134,plain,
    ! [X0: vTerm] :
      ( ~ visNV(X0)
      | ? [X1: vTerm] :
          ( visNV(X1)
          & ( X0 = vSucc(X1) ) )
      | ( X0 = vZero ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tff(f135,plain,
    ! [X0: vTerm] :
      ( ~ visNV(X0)
      | ? [X1: vTerm] :
          ( visNV(X1)
          & ( X0 = vSucc(X1) ) )
      | ( X0 = vZero ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f134]) ).

tff(f160,plain,
    ! [X0: vTerm] :
      ( ~ visNV(X0)
      | ( visNV(sK3(X0))
        & ( vSucc(sK3(X0)) = X0 ) )
      | ( X0 = vZero ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X1,sK3(X0))],[f135]) ).

tff(f173,plain,
    visNV(vFalse),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

tff(f200,plain,
    ! [X0: vTerm] :
      ( ~ visNV(X0)
      | ( vSucc(sK3(X0)) = X0 )
      | ( vZero = X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).

tff(f218,plain,
    ! [X0: vTerm] : ( vFalse != vSucc(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f219,plain,
    vFalse != vZero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    visNV(vFalse),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f173]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0_vTerm: vTerm] :
      ( ( X0_vTerm = vZero )
      | ( vSucc(sK3(X0_vTerm)) = X0_vTerm )
      | ~ visNV(X0_vTerm) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f200]) ).

tcf(c_94,plain,
    ! [X0_vTerm: vTerm] : vSucc(X0_vTerm) != vFalse,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f218]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    vZero != vFalse,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f219]) ).

tcf(c_3608,plain,
    ( ( vZero = vFalse )
    | ( vSucc(sK3(vFalse)) = vFalse ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_75]) ).

tcf(c_3624,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3608,c_95,c_94]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COM212_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:59:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.47  % Proving...
% 4.30/1.34  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.30/1.34  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.30/1.34  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 4.30/1.34  % 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 4.30/1.34   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 4.30/1.34  % 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Preprocessing...
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Proving...
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % 
% 4.30/1.34  % clauses                               92
% 4.30/1.34  % conjectures                           2
% 4.30/1.34  % EPR                                   11
% 4.30/1.34  % Horn                                  71
% 4.30/1.34  % unary                                 39
% 4.30/1.34  % binary                                32
% 4.30/1.34  % lits                                  186
% 4.30/1.34  % lits eq                               115
% 4.30/1.34  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.30/1.34  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.30/1.34  % fd_cond                               8
% 4.30/1.34  % fd_pseudo_cond                        9
% 4.30/1.34  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ 
% 4.30/1.34  % Current options:
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % ------ Proving...
% 4.30/1.34  % 
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.30/1.34  
% 4.30/1.34  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------