↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : COM280_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:11:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  31   ~;  20   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    7 (   6 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  54   !;   0   ?;  54   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    vRow: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    vVal: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort3,type,
    vName: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort4,type,
    vFType: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort5,type,
    vTType: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort6,type,
    vRawTable: $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    vrempty: vRow ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    vrcons: ( vRow * vVal ) > vRow ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    vttcons: ( vTType * ( vFType * vName ) ) > vTType ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    vtcons: ( vRawTable * vRow ) > vRawTable ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    vrt2: vRawTable ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    vttempty: vTType ).

tff(decl_79,type,
    vwelltypedRawtable: ( vRawTable * vTType ) > $o ).

tff(decl_100,type,
    vdropFirstColRaw: vRawTable > vRawTable ).

tff(decl_106,type,
    vwelltypedRow: ( vRow * vTType ) > $o ).

tff(decl_120,type,
    esk1_0: vName ).

tff(decl_121,type,
    esk2_0: vFType ).

tff(decl_122,type,
    esk3_0: vTType ).

tff(decl_157,type,
    esk38_2: ( vRow * vTType ) > vName ).

tff(decl_158,type,
    esk39_2: ( vRow * vTType ) > vFType ).

tff(decl_159,type,
    esk40_2: ( vRow * vTType ) > vTType ).

tff(decl_160,type,
    esk41_2: ( vRow * vTType ) > vVal ).

tff(decl_161,type,
    esk42_2: ( vRow * vTType ) > vRow ).

tff('DIFF-rempty-rcons',axiom,
    ! [X31: vVal,X32: vRow] : ( vrempty != vrcons(X31,X32) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','DIFF-rempty-rcons') ).

tff('welltypedRow-2',axiom,
    ! [X89: vTType,X90: vRow] :
      ( ( ( ! [X93: vVal,X94: vRow] : ( X90 != vrcons(X93,X94) )
          | ! [X91: vName,X92: vFType,X80: vTType] : ( X89 != vttcons(X91,X92,X80) ) )
        & ( ( X90 != vrempty )
          | ( X89 != vttempty ) ) )
     => ~ vwelltypedRow(X89,X90) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','welltypedRow-2') ).

tff('dropFirstColRawPreservesWelltypedRaw-tcons-rempty',conjecture,
    ! [X179: vName,X86: vFType,X460: vTType] :
      ( vwelltypedRawtable(vttcons(X179,X86,X460),vtcons(vrempty,vrt2))
     => vwelltypedRawtable(X460,vdropFirstColRaw(vtcons(vrempty,vrt2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','dropFirstColRawPreservesWelltypedRaw-tcons-rempty') ).

tff('welltypedRawtable-1',axiom,
    ! [X54: vTType,X88: vRow,X101: vRawTable] :
      ( vwelltypedRawtable(X54,vtcons(X88,X101))
    <=> ( vwelltypedRawtable(X54,X101)
        & vwelltypedRow(X54,X88) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','welltypedRawtable-1') ).

tff('DIFF-ttempty-ttcons',axiom,
    ! [X7: vName,X19: vFType,X20: vTType] : ( vttempty != vttcons(X7,X19,X20) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','DIFF-ttempty-ttcons') ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X31: vVal,X32: vRow] : ( vrempty != vrcons(X31,X32) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['DIFF-rempty-rcons']) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X89: vTType,X90: vRow] :
      ( ( ( ! [X93: vVal,X94: vRow] : ( X90 != vrcons(X93,X94) )
          | ! [X91: vName,X92: vFType,X80: vTType] : ( X89 != vttcons(X91,X92,X80) ) )
        & ( ( X90 != vrempty )
          | ( X89 != vttempty ) ) )
     => ~ vwelltypedRow(X89,X90) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['welltypedRow-2']) ).

tff(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X179: vName,X86: vFType,X460: vTType] :
        ( vwelltypedRawtable(vttcons(X179,X86,X460),vtcons(vrempty,vrt2))
       => vwelltypedRawtable(X460,vdropFirstColRaw(vtcons(vrempty,vrt2))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['dropFirstColRawPreservesWelltypedRaw-tcons-rempty']) ).

tff(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X533: vVal,X534: vRow] : ( vrempty != vrcons(X533,X534) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).

tff(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X548: vTType,X549: vRow] :
      ( ( ~ vwelltypedRow(X548,X549)
        | ( X549 = vrempty )
        | ( X549 = vrcons(esk41_2(X548,X549),esk42_2(X548,X549)) ) )
      & ( ~ vwelltypedRow(X548,X549)
        | ( X549 = vrempty )
        | ( X548 = vttcons(esk38_2(X548,X549),esk39_2(X548,X549),esk40_2(X548,X549)) ) )
      & ( ~ vwelltypedRow(X548,X549)
        | ( X548 = vttempty )
        | ( X549 = vrcons(esk41_2(X548,X549),esk42_2(X548,X549)) ) )
      & ( ~ vwelltypedRow(X548,X549)
        | ( X548 = vttempty )
        | ( X548 = vttcons(esk38_2(X548,X549),esk39_2(X548,X549),esk40_2(X548,X549)) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X465: vTType,X466: vRow,X467: vRawTable] :
      ( ( vwelltypedRawtable(X465,vtcons(X466,X467))
        | ~ vwelltypedRawtable(X465,X467)
        | ~ vwelltypedRow(X465,X466) )
      & ( ~ vwelltypedRawtable(X465,vtcons(X466,X467))
        | vwelltypedRawtable(X465,X467) )
      & ( ~ vwelltypedRawtable(X465,vtcons(X466,X467))
        | vwelltypedRow(X465,X466) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['welltypedRawtable-1'])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ vwelltypedRawtable(esk3_0,vdropFirstColRaw(vtcons(vrempty,vrt2)))
    & vwelltypedRawtable(vttcons(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vtcons(vrempty,vrt2)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X7: vName,X19: vFType,X20: vTType] : ( vttempty != vttcons(X7,X19,X20) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['DIFF-ttempty-ttcons']) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X31: vVal,X30: vRow] : vrempty != vrcons(X31,X30),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X18: vTType,X30: vRow] :
      ( ~ vwelltypedRow(X18,X30)
      | ( X18 = vttempty )
      | ( X30 = vrcons(esk41_2(X18,X30),esk42_2(X18,X30)) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X18: vTType,X30: vRow,X27: vRawTable] :
      ( ~ vwelltypedRawtable(X18,vtcons(X30,X27))
      | vwelltypedRow(X18,X30) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    vwelltypedRawtable(vttcons(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vtcons(vrempty,vrt2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

tff(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X545: vName,X546: vFType,X547: vTType] : ( vttempty != vttcons(X545,X546,X547) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]) ).

tcf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X18: vTType] :
      ( ~ vwelltypedRow(X18,vrempty)
      | ( X18 = vttempty ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

tcf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    vwelltypedRow(vttcons(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),vrempty),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

tcf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X7: vName,X19: vFType,X18: vTType] : vttempty != vttcons(X7,X19,X18),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : COM280_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.52  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.52  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.52  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.52  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.52  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.52  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.52  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.52  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:22:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.52  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.52  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.56  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.56  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.65  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % new_bool_1 with pid 3720808 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.65  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.65  % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.65  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.65  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3720810 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.65  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.65  % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.65  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.65  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.65  % Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.65  
% 0.17/0.65  % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.65  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.65  % Parsed axioms                        : 410
% 0.17/0.65  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 332
% 0.17/0.65  % Initial clauses                      : 405
% 0.17/0.65  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 405
% 0.17/0.65  % Processed clauses                    : 650
% 0.17/0.65  % ...of these trivial                  : 32
% 0.17/0.65  % ...subsumed                          : 299
% 0.17/0.65  % ...remaining for further processing  : 319
% 0.17/0.65  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 170
% 0.17/0.65  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.17/0.65  % Generated clauses                    : 2362
% 0.17/0.65  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1889
% 0.17/0.65  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Paramodulations                      : 2179
% 0.17/0.65  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Equation resolutions                 : 183
% 0.17/0.65  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Total rewrite steps                  : 483
% 0.17/0.65  % ...of those cached                   : 383
% 0.17/0.65  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.65  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.65  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.65  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.65  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.65  % Current number of processed clauses  : 312
% 0.17/0.65  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 0.17/0.65  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 0.17/0.65  %    Negative unit clauses             : 18
% 0.17/0.65  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 244
% 0.17/0.65  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1641
% 0.17/0.65  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4793
% 0.17/0.65  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.17/0.65  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11363
% 0.17/0.65  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10312
% 0.17/0.65  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 203
% 0.17/0.65  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 376
% 0.17/0.65  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 98
% 0.17/0.65  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 28
% 0.17/0.65  % BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 0.17/0.65  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.65  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 39293
% 0.17/0.65  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 5595
% 0.17/0.65  
% 0.17/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.65  % User time                : 0.049 s
% 0.17/0.65  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.65  % Total time               : 0.057 s
% 0.17/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 5200 pages
% 0.17/0.65  
% 0.17/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.65  % User time                : 0.066 s
% 0.17/0.65  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.65  % Total time               : 0.076 s
% 0.17/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.17/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------