%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR004+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 25 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 20 ~; 23 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(overflow_3,conjecture,
happens(overflow,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',overflow_3) ).
fof(happens_all_defn,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( happens(X4,X5)
<=> ( ( X4 = overflow
& holdsAt(filling,X5)
& holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X5) )
| ( X5 = n0
& X4 = tapOn ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+1.ax',happens_all_defn) ).
fof(waterLevel_3,lemma,
holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',waterLevel_3) ).
fof(filling_3,lemma,
holdsAt(filling,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',filling_3) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[overflow_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X42,X43] :
( ( happens(X42,X43)
| X42 != overflow
| ~ holdsAt(filling,X43)
| ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X43) )
& ( happens(X42,X43)
| X43 != n0
| X42 != tapOn )
& ( ~ happens(X42,X43)
| X43 = n0
| X42 = overflow )
& ( ~ happens(X42,X43)
| X43 = n0
| holdsAt(filling,X43) )
& ( ~ happens(X42,X43)
| X43 = n0
| holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X43) )
& ( ~ happens(X42,X43)
| X42 = tapOn
| X42 = overflow )
& ( ~ happens(X42,X43)
| X42 = tapOn
| holdsAt(filling,X43) )
& ( ~ happens(X42,X43)
| X42 = tapOn
| holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X43) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[happens_all_defn])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X2 != overflow
| ~ holdsAt(filling,X1)
| ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X1)
| happens(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ holdsAt(filling,X1)
| ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X1)
| happens(overflow,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,lemma,
holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[waterLevel_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
holdsAt(filling,n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[filling_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR004+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:23:34 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 3367728 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.43 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3367733 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.43 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.13/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 18
% 0.13/0.43 % Initial clauses : 104
% 0.13/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.13/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 103
% 0.13/0.43 % Processed clauses : 126
% 0.13/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % ...subsumed : 43
% 0.13/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 83
% 0.13/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 13
% 0.13/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.13/0.43 % Generated clauses : 104
% 0.13/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 75
% 0.13/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Paramodulations : 93
% 0.13/0.43 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.13/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 14
% 0.13/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 15
% 0.13/0.43 % ...of those cached : 6
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 74
% 0.13/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.13/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.13/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.13/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 37
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 52
% 0.13/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 232
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 224
% 0.13/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 212
% 0.13/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 0.13/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.13/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.13/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 0.13/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5576
% 0.13/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1057
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3948 pages
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.43 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.13/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------