%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR025+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:57 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 141.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query275,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_patterndetectormt)
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,c_tptpcol_15_130931) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query275) ).
fof(ax5_2395918,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,c_tptpcol_15_130931),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2395918) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_patterndetectormt)
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,c_tptpcol_15_130931) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query275]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,c_tptpcol_15_130931)
& mtvisible(c_patterndetectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,c_tptpcol_15_130931),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130933,c_tptpcol_15_130931),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_2395918]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR025+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:24:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/141.83 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/141.83 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/141.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 189 seconds (1512 total)
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting new_ho_10 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting sh3 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % sh3 with pid 3371462 completed with status 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Result found by sh3
% 0.18/141.83 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/141.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 189 seconds (1512 total)
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting new_ho_10 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting sh3 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/141.83 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/141.83 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/141.83 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 353 seconds (353 total)
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 32s (1) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting sh3 with 36s (1) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3372418 completed with status 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.18/141.83 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/141.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 189 seconds (1512 total)
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting new_ho_10 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting sh3 with 378s (2) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/141.83 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/141.83 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/141.83 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 353 seconds (353 total)
% 0.18/141.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 32s (1) cores
% 0.18/141.83 % Preprocessing time : 1.283 s
% 0.18/141.83
% 0.18/141.83 % Proof found!
% 0.18/141.83 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/141.83 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/141.83 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.18/141.83 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 0.18/141.83 % Initial clauses : 20002
% 0.18/141.83 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.18/141.83 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20000
% 0.18/141.83 % Processed clauses : 5127
% 0.18/141.83 % ...of these trivial : 169
% 0.18/141.83 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % ...remaining for further processing : 4957
% 0.18/141.83 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Backward-rewritten : 442
% 0.18/141.83 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Total rewrite steps : 612
% 0.18/141.83 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/141.83 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/141.83 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/141.83 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/141.83 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/141.83 % Current number of processed clauses : 4515
% 0.18/141.83 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4269
% 0.18/141.83 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Negative unit clauses : 24
% 0.18/141.83 % Non-unit-clauses : 222
% 0.18/141.83 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14873
% 0.18/141.83 % ...number of literals in the above : 21113
% 0.18/141.83 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Current number of archived clauses : 442
% 0.18/141.83 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1557
% 0.18/141.83 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1557
% 0.18/141.83 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2178
% 0.18/141.83 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % BW rewrite match attempts : 442
% 0.18/141.83 % BW rewrite match successes : 442
% 0.18/141.83 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/141.83 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22618644
% 0.18/141.83 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10466007
% 0.18/141.83
% 0.18/141.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/141.83 % User time : 21.730 s
% 0.18/141.83 % System time : 6.552 s
% 0.18/141.83 % Total time : 28.281 s
% 0.18/141.83 % Maximum resident set size: 5021636 pages
% 0.18/141.83
% 0.18/141.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/141.83 % User time : 130.271 s
% 0.18/141.83 % System time : 12.091 s
% 0.18/141.83 % Total time : 142.362 s
% 0.18/141.83 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.18/141.83 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------