%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR026+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 18.57s 7.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 18.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query176,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptprunningshorts,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query176) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_773,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member1489_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_773) ).
fof(ax3_3921,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2701_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_3921) ).
fof(ax3_4764,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1489_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4764) ).
fof(ax3_86,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_86) ).
fof(ax3_29493,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ( runningshorts(X6)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2701_mt) )
=> tptpofobject(X6,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_29493) ).
fof(ax3_5712,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> runningshorts(c_tptprunningshorts) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5712) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptprunningshorts,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query176]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X24054,X24055] :
( mtvisible(X24055)
| ~ genlmt(X24054,X24055)
| ~ mtvisible(X24054) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpofobject(c_tptprunningshorts,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member1489_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_773]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2701_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_3921]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1489_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4764]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_86]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X6545] :
( tptpofobject(X6545,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756))
| ~ runningshorts(X6545)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2701_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_29493])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( runningshorts(c_tptprunningshorts)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5712])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1489_mt)
| mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2701_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1489_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ runningshorts(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2701_mt)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| runningshorts(c_tptprunningshorts) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptprunningshorts,f_tptpquantityfn_2(n_756)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20,c_0_21,c_0_22,c_0_23,c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR026+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:25:53 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.57/7.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 18.57/7.44 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.57/7.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % new_bool_1 with pid 1218140 completed with status 9
% 18.57/7.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 1218139 completed with status 9
% 18.57/7.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 1218138 completed with status 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 18.57/7.44 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.57/7.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 18.57/7.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 18.57/7.44 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 18.57/7.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1495 seconds (1495 total)
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 150s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 898s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 150s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 147s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 1218184 completed with status 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 18.57/7.44 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.57/7.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 18.57/7.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 18.57/7.44 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 18.57/7.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1495 seconds (1495 total)
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 150s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 898s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 150s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 18.57/7.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.546 s
% 18.57/7.44 % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 18.57/7.44
% 18.57/7.44 % Proof found!
% 18.57/7.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 18.57/7.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.57/7.44 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 18.57/7.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Initial clauses : 44218
% 18.57/7.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 18.57/7.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 44215
% 18.57/7.44 % Processed clauses : 5376
% 18.57/7.44 % ...of these trivial : 199
% 18.57/7.44 % ...subsumed : 177
% 18.57/7.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 5000
% 18.57/7.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 18.57/7.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Backward-rewritten : 36
% 18.57/7.44 % Generated clauses : 5388
% 18.57/7.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4282
% 18.57/7.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Paramodulations : 5386
% 18.57/7.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % NegExts : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 18.57/7.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Total rewrite steps : 1472
% 18.57/7.44 % ...of those cached : 1231
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional clauses : 48083
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 17399
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 7
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.056
% 18.57/7.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.008
% 18.57/7.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 18.57/7.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.056
% 18.57/7.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.008
% 18.57/7.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 4962
% 18.57/7.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2702
% 18.57/7.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Negative unit clauses : 99
% 18.57/7.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 2161
% 18.57/7.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43121
% 18.57/7.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 62523
% 18.57/7.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 36
% 18.57/7.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1294881
% 18.57/7.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1177235
% 18.57/7.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 177
% 18.57/7.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 84269
% 18.57/7.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 38
% 18.57/7.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 18.57/7.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 18.57/7.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1835648
% 18.57/7.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 183137
% 18.57/7.44
% 18.57/7.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 18.57/7.44 % User time : 6.267 s
% 18.57/7.44 % System time : 0.263 s
% 18.57/7.44 % Total time : 6.530 s
% 18.57/7.44 % Maximum resident set size: 105780 pages
% 18.57/7.44
% 18.57/7.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 18.57/7.44 % User time : 16.226 s
% 18.57/7.44 % System time : 1.931 s
% 18.57/7.44 % Total time : 18.157 s
% 18.57/7.44 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 18.57/7.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------